Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

BiTE (CD19×CD3)

Blinatumomab

Blincyto · BLINA

BiTE (CD19×CD3) · approved 2014 · 8 citations

Aging evidence· through 2022
Fairly sourced6/9 · 5 signals
  • Met: 8 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 12y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Not met: Current through 2022
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

A CD19xCD3 BiTE whose renal risk is driven by cytokine release and tumor lysis rather than direct nephrotoxicity.

ModerateBispecific T-cell engager (CD19xCD3)
B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (relapsed/refractory)MRD-positive B-cell precursor ALL
§01

Signature kidney injury

Acute kidney injury is predominantly secondary to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) rather than a direct drug effect; renal injury is described mainly at the case/series level and is not robustly quantified as a primary endpoint. By analogy to immune-effector-cell therapies, AKI is generally low-grade and rapidly reversible when the syndrome is controlled.Source: Gutgarts et al., Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injuryAcute (~1–7 days)

Early — first days of an infusion cycle (CRS) or with rapid cytoreduction (TLS).

Distilled from: “Early, typically during the first days of an infusion cycle (CRS) or with rapid tumor cytoreduction (TLS), concentrated around initiation and dose step-up.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

  2. Acute Tubular NecrosisSecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Direct death of tubular epithelial cells — the dose-limiting lesion of the platinums and zoledronate.

  3. Crystal / Obstructive NephropathySecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Intratubular precipitation of drug or metabolite — high-dose methotrexate and tumor lysis crystals.

Toxicity fingerprint

Tap a signature to trace where it strikes the nephron.

Incidence not quantified
SeverityModerate
ReversibilityReversible
Evidence8 citations
Nephron map
Vasculature / Endothelium
Proximal Tubule
Distal Tubule / Collecting Duct
Tubular Lumen

Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI

Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

T-cell activation drives release of IFN-gamma, TNF, and especially IL-6; CRS produces a hemodynamic, prerenal pattern (systemic vasodilation, capillary leak with intravascular volume depletion, and renal hypoperfusion) that, if sustained, progresses to ischemic acute tubular injury. In parallel, rapid lysis of a high leukemic burden causes tumor lysis syndrome—hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia with calcium-phosphate deposition, and uric-acid crystal/cast formation—producing intratubular obstruction and crystal/urate nephropathy.

Clinical presentation

Rising creatinine during CRS (fever, hypotension, hypoxia), often with the metabolic derangements of TLS (hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperuricemia, hypocalcemia); oliguria and volume overload in severe cases.

Management

Treat CRS by grade (supportive care, corticosteroids, and tocilizumab for severe IL-6-driven CRS) and manage TLS aggressively (hydration, rasburicase for hyperuricemia, electrolyte correction, and renal replacement therapy for refractory hyperkalemia/hyperphosphatemia or oligoanuria). Interrupt blinatumomab for severe CRS; renal function generally recovers once the underlying syndrome is controlled.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • High leukemic burden (greater CRS and TLS risk)
  • Pre-existing chronic kidney disease
  • Volume depletion
  • Severe/high-grade CRS

Prevention

  • Stepwise (cycle 1) dosing and CRS-mitigation strategies, including dexamethasone premedication per protocol
  • TLS prophylaxis with vigorous hydration and rasburicase or allopurinol in high-burden disease
  • Cytoreduction before initiation in very high tumor burden, and close monitoring of renal function and tumor-lysis labs during initial cycles
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) that simultaneously binds CD19 on B cells and CD3 on T cells, forming an immunologic synapse that redirects polyclonal cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-positive leukemic blasts independent of MHC or co-stimulation. Used in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Note · The kidney is largely an innocent bystander of CRS/TLS rather than a direct drug target; renal-specific quantitative data are limited, so incidence is unquantified.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No specific renal dose adjustment for CrCl >=30 mL/min; pharmacokinetic data in severe impairment (CrCl <30) and dialysis are limited, so use with monitoring. The practical levers are step-up dosing and interruption for severe CRS/TLS rather than renal dose modification of the continuous infusion.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Not dialyzable as a therapeutic—a ~54 kDa bispecific protein given by continuous infusion with a very short half-life (~2 hours), cleared by catabolism; renal replacement therapy is used to treat TLS/AKI, not to remove the drug, and no supplemental dosing is needed.

Differential diagnosis

Separate CRS-driven prerenal/ischemic AKI (hypotension, capillary leak, responds to perfusion support) from TLS crystal/urate nephropathy (hyperuricemia/hyperphosphatemia, urate or calcium-phosphate deposition) and from concurrent sepsis or nephrotoxins. The temporal clustering with CRS grade and the tumor-lysis lab signature guide attribution.

Monitoring

  • Tumor lysis labs (potassium, phosphate, uric acid, calcium, creatinine) frequently during cycle 1
  • Vital signs for CRS (fever, hypotension) during initiation and step-up
  • Urine output and volume status

Key trials & series

  • TOWER phase 3 trial (Kantarjian NEJM 2017)
  • Gutgarts BBMT 2020 immune-effector-cell AKI cohort (analogous CRS-AKI)
  • Cairo Br J Haematol 2010 and Howard NEJM 2011 TLS frameworks

Clinical pearls

  • Blinatumomab does not poison the tubule directly—AKI is collateral damage from CRS hemodynamics and TLS.
  • Cytoreduce and give TLS prophylaxis (hydration plus rasburicase) before treating high-burden ALL.
  • Tocilizumab targets the IL-6 axis of severe CRS; steroids and supportive care round out management.
  • Dialysis here treats TLS/AKI, not the drug—the BiTE has a ~2-hour half-life and is not removed.
Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 3 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the BiTE (CD19×CD3) class.

Immune / Infusion

CRS, infusion reactions, irAEs, anaphylaxis

  • Cytokine release syndrome

Neurologic

Neuropathy, encephalopathy, ICANS, PRES

  • ICANS / neurotoxicity

Hematologic

Cytopenias, thrombosis, TMA

  • Cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia
§05

References

7 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Single-patient case reports are listed separately below, graded by strength. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

7 references · 2010–2022 · 2 since 2020
102010: 1 citation2011: 1 citation2014: 1 citation2016: 1 citation2017: 1 citation2020: 1 citation2022: 1 citation201020202022

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.LandmarkBlinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Kantarjian H et al. · N Engl J Med · 2017 · PMID 28249141Pivotal TOWER phase 3 trial establishing blinatumomab efficacy and its CRS/TLS safety profile.
  2. 2.Blinatumomab, a Bispecific T-cell Engager (BiTE) for CD-19 Targeted Cancer Immunotherapy: Clinical Pharmacology and Its Implications.Zhu M et al. · Clin Pharmacokinet · 2016 · PMID 27209293Clinical pharmacology of blinatumomab including cytokine release and tumor-lysis considerations.
  3. 3.Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome.Lee DW et al. · Blood · 2014 · PMID 24876563Original CRS grading and management consensus underpinning CRS-associated AKI care.
  4. 4.The tumor lysis syndrome.Howard SC et al. · N Engl J Med · 2011 · PMID 21561350Authoritative review of TLS mechanism, classification, and management relevant to high-burden ALL.
  5. 5.Recommendations for the evaluation of risk and prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) in adults and children with malignant diseases: an expert TLS panel consensus.Cairo MS et al. · Br J Haematol · 2010 · PMID 20331465Expert-panel TLS risk stratification and prophylaxis guideline.
  6. 6.Acute Kidney Injury after CAR-T Cell Therapy: Low Incidence and Rapid Recovery.Gutgarts V et al. · Biol Blood Marrow Transplant · 2020 · PMID 32088364AKI incidence and recovery after immune-effector-cell therapy, mechanistically analogous to BiTE CRS-AKI.
  7. 7.Acute Kidney Injury in Cancer Immunotherapy Recipients.Joseph A et al. · Cells · 2022 · PMID 36552755Review describing AKI from CRS, TLS, and sepsis with bispecific T-cell engagers and CAR-T therapies.
Case reports — ranked by strength· 1

Single-patient and small-series reports, graded by evidentiary strength — A Strong (biopsy-proven plus a series and/or positive rechallenge), B Moderate, and C Limited (a single clinically-diagnosed case). Strongest first. Grades are inferred automatically from each report's abstract and journal — a heuristic ranking aid, not a formal quality appraisal.

FDA label — boxed warning & renal dosing· boxed warning

Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (Apr 2026) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .

Boxed warning

WARNING: CYTOKINE RELEASE SYNDROME and NEUROLOGICAL TOXICITIES including IMMUNE EFFECTOR CELL-ASSOCIATED NEUROTOXICITY SYNDROME Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), which may be life-threatening or fatal, occurred in patients receiving BLINCYTO. Interrupt or discontinue BLINCYTO and treat with corticosteroids as recommended [see Dosage and Administration (2.4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Neurological toxicities, including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) which may be severe, life-threatening, or fatal, occurred in patients receiving BLINCYTO. Interrupt or discontinue BLINCYTO as recommended [see Dosage and Administration (2.4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] . WARNING: CYTOKINE RELEASE SYNDROME and NEUROLOGICAL TOXICITIES including IMMUNE EFFECTOR CELL-ASSOCIATED NEUROTOXICITY SYNDROME See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), which may be life-threatening or fatal, occurred in patients receiving BLINCYTO. Interrupt or discontinue BLINCYTO and treat with corticosteroids as recommended. ( 2.4 , 5.1 ) Neurological toxicities, including immune effector cell - associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which may be severe, life-threatening, or fatal, occurred in patients receiving BLINCYTO. Interrupt or discontinue BLINCYTO as recommended. ( 2.4 , 5.2 )

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 10,373 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Reporting odds ratio (ROR) — is kidney injury named in this agent's reports more often than in every other drug's? Above 1 means yes, disproportionately.
  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 3 signals

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKINot queried in FAERS — No MedDRA term set is defined for this phenotype, so FAERS was never asked about it.
  • Acute Tubular NecrosisNot measurable in reporting — Reporters cannot reliably name this lesion, so its absence from FAERS is expected and is not evidence against the documented injury.
  • Crystal / Obstructive NephropathyNo disproportionate reporting — This phenotype IS reportable and this agent has enough reports, yet the reporting is not disproportionate — the one genuinely informative negative of the four.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy
ROR 5.1295% CI 3.74–7.01· 39 reports
Acute Interstitial Nephritis
ROR 2.6095% CI 1.74–3.88· 24 reports
Electrolyte Disturbance
ROR 1.3495% CI 1.12–1.59· 126 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 18.2% of reports w/ death · 26.9% w/ hospitalization
18.2%

Reported with a death outcome

1,893 of 10,373 reports

26.9%

Reported with hospitalization

2,787 of 10,373 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 446 reports
  • 2016: 712 reports
  • 2017: 808 reports
  • 2018: 803 reports
  • 2019: 865 reports
  • 2020: 789 reports
  • 2021: 1,012 reports
  • 2022: 959 reports
  • 2023: 1,099 reports
  • 2024: 1,295 reports
  • 2025: 1,064 reports
  • 2026: 513 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 6 systems · 10,373 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

Disproportionality (acute kidney injury):ROR 1.1795% CI 0.95–1.44· 88 AKI reports ·no disproportionate AKI reporting signal (CI spans 1).
Immune / infection
Cytokine Release Syndrome1,095Infection260Pneumonia195Sepsis187
Nervous system
Neurotoxicity576Headache370Tremor276Seizure269Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome219
General / constitutional
Pyrexia1,160
Blood & lymphatic
Neutropenia319Febrile Neutropenia307Thrombocytopenia227
Psychiatric
Confusional State230
Vascular
Hypotension161
Guidelines & consensus· 19

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

ASCOManagement of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: ASCO GuidelineJ Clin Oncol 2021 · PMID 34724386Grade toxicities by ASTCT criteria; manage CRS with supportive care escalating to tocilizumab with or without corticosteroids, and manage moderate-to-severe ICANS with corticosteroids and supportive care given potential for rapid decline.TLS Expert PanelGuidelines for the management of pediatric and adult tumor lysis syndrome: an evidence-based reviewJ Clin Oncol 2008 · PMID 18509186Prevention is the best management: hydration plus prophylactic rasburicase for high-risk patients, hydration plus allopurinol or rasburicase for intermediate-risk, and monitoring for low-risk; for established TLS add aggressive hydration and diuresis plus allopurinol or rasburicase for hyperuricemia. Urinary alkalinization is NOT recommended.TLS Consensus PanelRecommendations for the evaluation of risk and prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) in adults and children with malignant diseases: an expert TLS panel consensusBr J Haematol 2010 · PMID 20331465Stratify each patient as low/intermediate/high TLS risk using tumor type, bulk/stage, proliferation rate, baseline laboratory TLS, and renal impairment/involvement, then match prophylaxis intensity (monitoring vs allopurinol vs rasburicase) to the assigned risk level.BCSHGuidelines for the management of tumour lysis syndrome in adults and children with haematological malignancies on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in HaematologyBr J Haematol 2015 · PMID 25876990Risk-adapted prophylaxis and management of TLS in haematological malignancy: hydration with allopurinol for lower-risk and rasburicase for high-risk patients, with monitoring of electrolytes and renal function to prevent and treat AKI.Cairo-BishopTumour lysis syndrome: new therapeutic strategies and classificationBr J Haematol 2004 · PMID 15384972Defines the Cairo-Bishop criteria distinguishing laboratory TLS (>=2 metabolic abnormalities: hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia within 3 days before to 7 days after therapy) from clinical TLS (laboratory TLS plus AKI, cardiac arrhythmia, or seizure), with a severity grading scheme adopted by subsequent guidelines.ASTCTASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector CellsBiol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019 · PMID 30592986Grade CRS by fever, hypotension and hypoxia (grades 1-4) and grade ICANS using the ICE/encephalopathy score plus level of consciousness, seizures, motor findings and raised intracranial pressure/edema; this is the standard severity framework that triggers tocilizumab and corticosteroid escalation in CAR-T and bispecific antibody toxicity (the Lee 2019 consensus).

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Blinatumomab sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Elranatamab

Elrexfio · Bispecific (BCMA×CD3)

Profile

CRS and tumor lysis — emerging.

PREATNXTAL
Moderate#1 · 100% phenotype match

Talquetamab

Talvey · Bispecific (GPRC5D×CD3)

Profile

CRS-related AKI — emerging.

PREATN
Moderate#2 · 84% phenotype match

Teclistamab

Tecvayli · Bispecific (BCMA×CD3)

Profile

CRS-associated AKI in myeloma — emerging signal.

PREATN
Moderate#3 · 84% phenotype match

CAR-T cell therapy

Kymriah · Yescarta · CAR-T cell therapy

Profile

CRS-driven prerenal AKI and tumor lysis.

PREATNXTAL
Moderate#4 · 81% phenotype match

Odronextamab

Ordspono · Bispecific (CD20×CD3)

Profile

CD20×CD3 bispecific; tumor-lysis urate crystal nephropathy with CRS.

XTALPRELYTE
Moderate#5 · 77% phenotype match

Tretinoin (ATRA)

Vesanoid · Retinoid (differentiating agent)

Profile

Differentiation syndrome → capillary leak and AKI.

PREATN
Moderate#6 · 73% phenotype match
Compare Blinatumomab with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across Bispecifics / T-cell engagers

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1LinvoseltamabMild
  2. 2TebentafuspModerate
  3. 3CatumaxomabModerate
  4. 4TarlatamabModerate
  5. 5TeclistamabModerate
  6. 6Blinatumomab· this agentModerate
  7. 7ElranatamabModerate
  8. 8EpcoritamabModerate
  9. 9GlofitamabModerate
  10. 10MosunetuzumabModerate
  11. 11OdronextamabModerate
  12. 12TalquetamabFAERS AKIModerate

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.