Back to explorer

FGFR inhibitor

Erdafitinib

Balversa · Erda

The first FGFR inhibitor in urothelial cancer — on-target FGFR1 blockade drives hyperphosphatemia.

ModerateFGFR inhibitor · approved 2019
FGFR2/3-altered locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Signature kidney injury

Electrolyte Wasting
Representative incidence73%

Hyperphosphatemia is the most common, on-target class adverse event — reported in the large majority of treated patients (~73-78% across studies) and used as a pharmacodynamic marker for protocol-driven dose up-titration. Grade >=3 hyperphosphatemia is much less frequent (~2%).

Source: Nishina et al., Invest New Drugs 2017

Mechanism of kidney injury

FGFR1 inhibition disrupts the FGF23-Klotho-FGFR1 axis that normally suppresses proximal-tubular phosphate reabsorption (by down-regulating the NaPi-2a/2c cotransporters) and inhibits 1-alpha-hydroxylase. Blocking this signaling increases tubular phosphate reabsorption and raises serum phosphate; sustained hyperphosphatemia with a high calcium-phosphate product risks soft-tissue and vascular calcification (including calcinosis cutis) and nephrocalcinosis.

Clinical presentation

Asymptomatic hyperphosphatemia detected on routine labs, often within the first 2-3 weeks; may be accompanied by an elevated calcium-phosphate product. Severe/persistent cases risk metastatic mineral deposition; non-renal effects (stomatitis, nail and skin changes, central serous retinopathy) are common.

Onset

Early — typically within the first 1-2 cycles, used to guide pharmacodynamic up-titration.

Reversibility

Reversible

Anticancer mechanism

Oral pan-FGFR (FGFR1-4) tyrosine kinase inhibitor; blocks oncogenic FGFR signaling in FGFR-altered tumors. Approved for FGFR2/3-altered locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Management

Per label: if phosphate exceeds ~5.5 mg/dL, restrict dietary phosphate and start an oral phosphate binder (e.g. sevelamer); for higher thresholds (~7-10 mg/dL or symptoms) interrupt and dose-reduce, and discontinue for persistent levels >10 mg/dL despite intervention. Up-titrate the dose at day 14-21 only if phosphate is <5.5 mg/dL and no significant toxicity.

Risk factors

  • Higher dose / up-titration to 9 mg
  • Pre-existing CKD
  • High dietary phosphate or phosphate supplements

Prevention

  • Serum phosphate monitoring with protocol-based dose titration
  • Low-phosphate diet (~600-800 mg/day) when phosphate rises
  • Avoid phosphate-containing supplements/laxatives
Note · Hyperphosphatemia is an expected on-target effect (FGFR1) and a dosing biomarker — not idiosyncratic toxicity.

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No starting-dose change for mild-moderate renal impairment; severe impairment and dialysis are not well studied (use with caution). The principal 'dose adjustment' is phosphate-guided titration/interruption rather than a CrCl-based rule.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Highly protein-bound oral small molecule; not expected to be appreciably dialyzed. No validated ESKD dosing — phosphate handling is also altered in ESKD, complicating the pharmacodynamic phosphate biomarker.

Differential diagnosis

FGFR-inhibitor hyperphosphatemia (on-target, early, isolated, dose-related) vs hyperphosphatemia of CKD/ESKD, tumor lysis (accompanied by hyperuricemia/hyperkalemia and AKI), or exogenous phosphate load. The temporal link to dosing and use as a PD marker are characteristic.

Monitoring

  • Serum phosphate at baseline and every 2-3 weeks early (then monthly) to drive dose titration
  • Serum calcium and calcium-phosphate product
  • Ophthalmologic exams for central serous retinopathy; routine creatinine

Key trials & series

  • BLC2001 (registrational FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma)
  • THOR (erdafitinib vs chemotherapy/pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma)
  • RAGNAR (tumor-agnostic FGFR-altered solid tumors)
  • Siefker-Radtke 2023 BLC2001 TEAE-management analysis

Clinical pearls

  • Hyperphosphatemia here is an expected on-target FGFR1 effect and a dosing biomarker — not idiosyncratic toxicity — and is actually used to confirm adequate target engagement before up-titration.
  • Manage with diet and binders first; reserve dose interruption/reduction for higher thresholds.
  • Sustained high calcium-phosphate product can cause calcinosis cutis and nephrocalcinosis — keep the product down, not just the phosphate.

Where it strikes

Nephron segments

Proximal Tubule

Bulk reabsorption + drug uptake (OCT2, OATs)

Injury signatures

Electrolyte Wasting

Beyond the kidney

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of fgfr inhibitors.

Ophthalmic

Keratopathy, uveitis, retinopathy

  • Central serous retinopathy

Dermatologic

Rash, HFS, SJS/TEN, vitiligo

  • Nail/skin changes, hand-foot syndrome

Evidence

7 peer-reviewed references. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

LandmarkFGFR-targeted therapeutics: clinical activity, mechanisms of resistance and new directions.Katoh M et al. · Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024 · PMID 38424198Authoritative review attributing FGFR-inhibitor hyperphosphatemia to off-target/on-target FGFR1 inhibition of renal phosphate handling.PMIDSafety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamics of erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors.Nishina T et al. · Invest New Drugs 2017 · PMID 28965185Phase 1 data: hyperphosphatemia in ~73.7% as the most common treatment-emergent event and PD marker.PMIDManagement of Fibroblast Growth Factor Inhibitor Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Interest in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.Siefker-Radtke AO et al. · Eur Urol Open Sci 2023 · PMID 37101768BLC2001 analysis detailing hyperphosphatemia (78%) and phosphate-guided dose-modification management.PMIDErdafitinib in patients with advanced solid tumours with FGFR alterations (RAGNAR): an international, single-arm, phase 2 study.Pant S et al. · Lancet Oncol 2023 · PMID 37541273Tumor-agnostic phase 2 trial reporting hyperphosphatemia among key adverse events.PMIDSafety and efficacy of the pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib in advanced urothelial carcinoma and other solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Zheng X et al. · Front Oncol 2023 · PMID 36776367Meta-analysis confirming hyperphosphatemia as the most common all-grade adverse event.PMIDCalcinosis cutis dermatologic toxicity associated with fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor for the treatment of Wilms tumor.Arudra K et al. · J Cutan Pathol 2018 · PMID 30021048Illustrates ectopic calcification (calcinosis cutis) from sustained FGFR-inhibitor hyperphosphatemia; supports monitoring phosphate, calcium, FGF23.PMIDCurrent Trends in Anti-Cancer Molecular Targeted Therapies: Renal Complications and Their Histological Features.Tonooka A et al. · J Nippon Med Sch 2021 · PMID 34840210Onconephrology review covering FGFR-inhibitor electrolyte and tubular effects.

Related agents

Other agents sharing the same signature kidney injury.

Cetuximab & Panitumumab

Erbitux · Vectibix · Anti-EGFR antibody

Profile

TRPM6 magnesium wasting.

LYTE
MildOpen →

Necitumumab

Portrazza · Anti-EGFR antibody

Profile

Severe hypomagnesemia, class effect.

LYTE
ModerateOpen →

Imatinib

Gleevec · BCR-ABL TKI

Profile

Fluid retention; rare Fanconi and AKI.

LYTEFANCATN
MildOpen →