Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

EGFR TKI

Erlotinib

Tarceva · ERL

EGFR TKI · approved 2004 · 9 citations

Recent· through 2024
Deeply sourced7/9 · 6 signals
  • Met: 9 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 17y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Met: Current through 2024
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

An oral EGFR TKI rarely linked to minimal-change-type glomerular disease, AKI, and dehydration from GI toxicity.

MildEGFR TKI
EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancerLocally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (with gemcitabine)
§01

Signature kidney injury

Representative incidence3%

Glomerular disease (including minimal-change-type nephrotic syndrome) and acute kidney injury are reported rarely, at the case level; pharmacovigilance data show measurable disproportionality signals for AKI/renal failure (and rare TMA) but no robust trial-based incidence. Reported rate: proteinuria in 3% — Erlotinib-MONOTHERAPY comparator arm of 4 randomized controlled trials in EGFR-mutation-positive advanced NSCLC (Deng 2022, PMID 35985780).Source: Deng et al., BMJ Open 2022

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injurySubacute (~1–6 weeks)

Weeks to months after starting; proteinuria/creatinine typically improve over weeks after discontinuation.

Distilled from: “Weeks to months after starting therapy; proteinuria/creatinine typically improve over weeks after discontinuation in reported cases.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Damage to the filtration barrier — podocyte injury, FSGS and protein leak from VEGF and mTOR blockade.

  2. Acute Tubular NecrosisSecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Direct death of tubular epithelial cells — the dose-limiting lesion of the platinums and zoledronate.

  3. Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKISecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

  4. Thrombotic MicroangiopathySecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Endothelial injury with microvascular thrombi, hemolysis and thrombocytopenia — gemcitabine, mitomycin C, anti-VEGF.

Toxicity fingerprint

Tap a signature to trace where it strikes the nephron.

3%incidence
SeverityMild
ReversibilityReversible
Evidence9 citations
Nephron map
GlomerulusFiltration barrier (podocytes + endothelium)
Vasculature / Endothelium
Proximal Tubule
Distal Tubule / Collecting Duct

Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria

Damage to the filtration barrier — podocyte injury, FSGS and protein leak from VEGF and mTOR blockade.

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

Proposed mechanisms relate to EGFR signaling in podocytes and tubular cells. Case reports describe nephrotic-range proteinuria with minimal-change/minor glomerular abnormalities (podocyte foot-process effacement on a near-normal light-microscopic background) that remit on drug withdrawal, suggesting a drug-associated podocytopathy; acute tubular injury/AKI is also described, frequently compounded by volume depletion from EGFR-TKI-associated diarrhea and anorexia, and rare thrombotic microangiopathy has been signaled.

Clinical presentation

Proteinuria (occasionally nephrotic-range with edema and hypoalbuminemia) and/or a rising creatinine. Diarrhea, mucositis, and reduced intake commonly contribute a prerenal/ischemic component with concentrated urine and low urine output.

Management

Evaluate proteinuria and renal function and consider biopsy for nephrotic syndrome or unexplained AKI; for significant nephrotic syndrome or AKI, hold or discontinue erlotinib, which often leads to remission. Provide supportive care, volume repletion, and RAAS blockade for proteinuria as appropriate.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • Pre-existing chronic kidney disease
  • Volume depletion from EGFR-TKI-associated diarrhea/anorexia
  • Concurrent nephrotoxins

Prevention

  • Aggressive management of diarrhea and maintenance of hydration
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Reversible, ATP-competitive EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks EGFR autophosphorylation and downstream RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT proliferative signaling. Used in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and (with gemcitabine) advanced pancreatic cancer.

Note · Renal toxicity is uncommon and largely case-based; a published case of gefitinib-associated minimal-change nephrotic syndrome was successfully switched to erlotinib without recurrence, underscoring that severe glomerular events are idiosyncratic rather than uniform across EGFR TKIs.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No specific dose reduction is established for renal impairment (erlotinib is hepatically metabolized via CYP3A4/1A2 and biliary-excreted); use caution in severe impairment as renal data are sparse, and manage GI-driven volume depletion proactively. The pancreatic-cancer regimen pairs it with gemcitabine, which has its own renal considerations.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Not appreciably dialyzable—highly protein-bound (~93%), lipophilic, with predominantly hepatic clearance and minimal renal elimination; hemodialysis is not expected to remove meaningful drug.

Differential diagnosis

Distinguish drug-associated podocytopathy/minimal-change disease (abrupt nephrotic syndrome remitting on withdrawal) from paraneoplastic glomerulopathy of the underlying cancer, and separate true intrinsic AKI from prerenal azotemia caused by diarrhea/anorexia (low urine sodium, responds to volume). Consider rare erlotinib-associated TMA when AKI is accompanied by hemolysis and thrombocytopenia.

Monitoring

  • Urinalysis/urine protein at baseline and periodically
  • Serum creatinine/eGFR each cycle, more often during diarrhea
  • Volume status and electrolytes during GI toxicity

Key trials & series

  • Moore JCO 2007 erlotinib-gemcitabine pancreatic registration trial
  • Maruyama Intern Med 2015 EGFR-TKI minimal-change nephrotic case
  • Crosnier Cancers 2021 VigiBase EGFR renal-safety pharmacovigilance

Clinical pearls

  • Most erlotinib 'renal' events are prerenal from diarrhea/anorexia—rehydrate before assuming intrinsic injury.
  • True nephrotic syndrome is a rare minimal-change-type podocytopathy that usually remits when the drug is stopped.
Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 3 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the EGFR TKI class.

Dermatologic

Rash, HFS, SJS/TEN, vitiligo

  • Acneiform rash, paronychia

Gastrointestinal

Diarrhea, colitis, mucositis, perforation

  • Diarrhea

Pulmonary

Pneumonitis, ILD, effusions, hypertension

  • Interstitial lung disease (EGFR TKIs)
§05

References

7 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Single-patient case reports are listed separately below, graded by strength. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

7 references · 2007–2024 · 2 since 2022
302007: 1 citation2015: 3 citations2021: 1 citation2022: 1 citation2024: 1 citation2007201020202024

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Deng W et al. · BMJ Open · 2022 · PMID 35985780Source of the stored incidence: A total of 776 cases were used for a pooled analysis of AEs. ... combined treatment significantly increased the incidence of ... proteinuria (25% vs 3%, 95% CI 4.86 to 17.66; p<0.0001) ... - the 3% is the erlotinib-monotherapy arm, the figure carried in the incidence prose.
  2. 2.LandmarkMinimal change nephrotic syndrome associated with gefitinib and a successful switch to erlotinib.Maruyama K et al. · Intern Med · 2015 · PMID 25832950Documents EGFR-TKI-associated minimal-change nephrotic syndrome and tolerated erlotinib rechallenge.
  3. 3.Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.Moore MJ et al. · J Clin Oncol · 2007 · PMID 17452677Registrational pancreatic-cancer trial; reference for the gemcitabine-erlotinib regimen and its toxicity context.
  4. 4.Renal Safety Profile of EGFR Targeted Therapies: A Study from VigiBase, the WHO Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports.Crosnier A et al. · Cancers (Basel) · 2021 · PMID 34885014Pharmacovigilance disproportionality signals for erlotinib including AKI, renal failure, and TMA/HUS.
  5. 5.Renal toxicity of anticancer agents targeting HER2 and EGFR.Cosmai L et al. · J Nephrol · 2015 · PMID 26341657Onconephrology review of EGFR-directed renal toxicity, covering erlotinib.
  6. 6.New drug toxicities in the onco-nephrology world.Perazella MA · Kidney Int · 2015 · PMID 25671763Onconephrology review summarizing proteinuria, AKI, and glomerular effects of targeted agents including EGFR TKIs.
  7. 7.Onconephrology: mitigation of renal injury in chemotherapy administration.Selamet U et al. · Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens · 2024 · PMID 38095483Contemporary onconephrology review of targeted-therapy renal toxicities and mitigation strategies.

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 12,442 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Reporting odds ratio (ROR) — is kidney injury named in this agent's reports more often than in every other drug's? Above 1 means yes, disproportionately.
  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 5 signals

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Glomerular Injury / Proteinuriacorroborated · ROR 6.14 — but the naming terms alone are not disproportionate, so this rests on terms merely consistent with the lesion
  • Thrombotic Microangiopathycorroborated · ROR 3.17
  • Acute Tubular NecrosisNot measurable in reporting — Reporters cannot reliably name this lesion, so its absence from FAERS is expected and is not evidence against the documented injury.
  • Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKINot queried in FAERS — No MedDRA term set is defined for this phenotype, so FAERS was never asked about it.
Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria
ROR 6.1495% CI 5.07–7.45· 105 reports
SIADH / Hyponatremia
ROR 3.6695% CI 3.15–4.26· 173 reports
Electrolyte Disturbance
ROR 3.3895% CI 3.05–3.75· 375 reports
Thrombotic Microangiopathy
ROR 3.1795% CI 2.20–4.56· 29 reports
Hypertension
ROR 1.2695% CI 1.12–1.41· 286 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 46.3% of reports w/ death · 31.2% w/ hospitalization
46.3%

Reported with a death outcome

5,764 of 12,442 reports

31.2%

Reported with hospitalization

3,885 of 12,442 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 2,142 reports
  • 2016: 820 reports
  • 2017: 727 reports
  • 2018: 722 reports
  • 2019: 435 reports
  • 2020: 407 reports
  • 2021: 482 reports
  • 2022: 440 reports
  • 2023: 288 reports
  • 2024: 333 reports
  • 2025: 170 reports
  • 2026: 85 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 8 systems · 12,442 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

Disproportionality (acute kidney injury):ROR 0.9295% CI 0.74–1.14· 83 AKI reports ·no disproportionate AKI reporting signal (CI spans 1).
Gastrointestinal
Diarrhoea1,338Nausea696Vomiting577Abdominal Pain262
General / constitutional
Fatigue719Asthenia463Malaise379Pyrexia341Pain308
Skin
Rash1,317Dermatitis Acneiform231
Respiratory
Dyspnoea484Pleural Effusion266Cough239Pulmonary Embolism234
Metabolic & electrolyte
Decreased Appetite512Dehydration381
Blood & lymphatic
Anaemia496Neutropenia265
Immune / infection
Pneumonia419
Vascular
Hypertension246
Guidelines & consensus· 13

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Erlotinib sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

mTOR inhibitors (everolimus · temsirolimus)

mTOR inhibitor

Profile

Podocyte injury → proteinuria and FSGS.

GLOMATNTMA
Mild#1 · 77% phenotype match

Sirolimus

Rapamune · mTOR inhibitor

Profile

Proteinuria, cast nephropathy, delayed graft recovery.

GLOMATN
Moderate#2 · 60% phenotype match

Clofarabine

Clolar · Purine analog

Profile

Capillary-leak / SIRS-like AKI and tumor lysis.

PREATNGLOM
Moderate#3 · 57% phenotype match

Afatinib

Gilotrif · EGFR TKI

Profile

Diarrhea-driven prerenal AKI.

PREATNLYTE
Mild#4 · 56% phenotype match

Adagrasib

Krazati · KRAS G12C inhibitor

Profile

Creatinine rise; emerging data.

PREGLOMPSEUDO
Mild#5 · 53% phenotype match

Bleomycin

Blenoxane · Antitumor antibiotic

Profile

Renally excreted (~2/3 in urine); half-life rises exponentially below CrCl 25-35 — exposure/clearance issue amplifying pulmonary toxicity, not a direct nephrotoxin.

PRE
Mild#6 · 52% phenotype match
Compare Erlotinib with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across EGFR / HER2 inhibitors

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1LazertinibMild
  2. 2SevabertinibMild
  3. 3ZongertinibMild
  4. 4GefitinibMild
  5. 5MobocertinibMild
  6. 6OsimertinibMild
  7. 7SunvozertinibMild
  8. 8Erlotinib· this agentMild
  9. 9TucatinibFAERS AKIMild
  10. 10AfatinibFAERS AKIMild
  11. 11NeratinibFAERS AKIModerate

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.

Who studies this

The leading contributors to Erlotinib’s clinical kidney literature on PubMed, ranked by a blend of publication volume and citation impact — filtered toward clinical work via the PubMed Humans heading and clinical publication types (trials, cohorts, case reports, guidelines, reviews). Names link to that author’s work on Erlotinib; the PMIDs beside each name are up to three of their most recent papers on it, not the full count.

  1. Herbst, Roy S — their work on Erlotinib, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)3 papers · 574 citesPMID 20593550 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 16857821 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 15753462 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  2. Seto, Takashi — their work on Erlotinib, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)3 papers · 687 citesPMID 40995949 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 29043496 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 25175099 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  3. Yamamoto, Nobuyuki — their work on Erlotinib, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)2 papers · 686 citesPMID 29043496 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 25175099 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  4. Sandler, Alan — their work on Erlotinib, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)2 papers · 501 citesPMID 16857821 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 15753462 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  5. Nishio, Makoto — their work on Erlotinib, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)3 papers · 687 citesPMID 40995949 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 29043496 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 25175099 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Ranked by a 50/50 blend of publication volume and a position-weighted, capped Relative Citation Ratio (NIH iCite) on this agent’s renal literature; the citation count shown is the raw total, not the ranking score — counted over the 44 clinical records among all 68 PubMed matches, so counts are within-sample — bibliometric context, not an endorsement or a measure of clinical authority.