Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

Bisphosphonate

Ibandronate

Boniva · Iband

Bisphosphonate · approved 2003 · 9 citations

Recent· through 2024
Deeply sourced7/9 · 6 signals
  • Met: 9 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 21y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Met: Current through 2024
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

The kidney-gentlest nitrogen bisphosphonate — renal events near placebo at standard doses.

MildNitrogen bisphosphonate
Metastatic bone disease (breast)Hypercalcemia of malignancyPost-menopausal osteoporosis
§01

Signature kidney injury

Signature lesion

Representative incidence2%

Lower renal risk than zoledronate or pamidronate. In a 2-year phase III breast-cancer trial, adverse renal events with IV ibandronate were ~4% versus ~4.5% with placebo — essentially at background. Bisphosphonates as a class can cause toxic ATN (zoledronate) or collapsing FSGS (pamidronate), but ibandronate is the renal-safety outlier within the class. Reported rate: serum creatinine increase >=44.2 micromol/l in 2% — Women with breast cancer and bone metastases receiving intravenous ibandronate 6 mg every 3-4 weeks for up to 6 months,… (von 2008, PMID 18334511).Source: von Moos et al., Ann Oncol 2008 (serum creatinine rise >=44.2 micromol/l in 2/101; Jackson, Oncologist 2005 for the 4% vs 4.5% placebo comparison)

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injuryAcute (~1–7 days)

Acute when it occurs (days), related to dose and infusion rate; antiresorptive electrolyte effects within the first days.

Distilled from: “Acute when it occurs (days), related to dose and infusion rate; antiresorptive electrolyte effects within the first days.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Acute Tubular Necrosis#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Direct death of tubular epithelial cells — the dose-limiting lesion of the platinums and zoledronate.

  2. Hypocalcemia ~16% in pooled long-term IV bisphosphonate cohort (incl. ibandronate); grade 3 renal toxicity 0.7%

  3. Glomerular Injury / ProteinuriaRarequalitative — no citable incidence

    Damage to the filtration barrier — podocyte injury, FSGS and protein leak from VEGF and mTOR blockade.

Toxicity fingerprint

Tap a signature to trace where it strikes the nephron.

2%incidence
SeverityMild
ReversibilityReversible
Evidence9 citations
Nephron map
Glomerulus
Proximal TubuleBulk reabsorption + drug uptake (OCT2, OATs)
Distal Tubule / Collecting DuctFine-tuning of Na, K, Mg, acid & water

Acute Tubular Necrosis

Direct death of tubular epithelial cells — the dose-limiting lesion of the platinums and zoledronate.

§03

Kidney injury

Deep diveBisphosphonate nephrotoxicityThe intravenous bisphosphonates that protect bone in myeloma and metastatic cancer split the nephron between them — pamidronate poisons the podocyte and produces a collapsing FSGS with nephrotic-range proteinuria, while zoledronate poisons the proximal tubule and produces a toxic ATN — and both are dose- and infusion-rate-dependent, so the same monitoring that catches them also prevents them.

Mechanism of kidney injury

Bisphosphonates are filtered, not metabolized, and concentrate in the renal cortex; ~50–60% of an IV dose is renally excreted while the remainder binds bone. High peak tubular concentrations — driven by dose and infusion rate — produce dose-dependent toxic acute tubular necrosis of the proximal tubule (the zoledronate pattern), whereas slow pamidronate accumulation more often injures podocytes (collapsing FSGS). Ibandronate has high bone-binding avidity (~98% bone uptake even in dialysis patients) and is given at lower molar doses over recommended infusion times, so nephrotoxic tubular peaks are rarely reached and clinically significant injury is uncommon.

Clinical presentation

Usually no significant change in serum creatinine at standard dosing. When injury occurs it is a non-oliguric creatinine rise with bland or granular-cast urine consistent with ATN, sometimes accompanied by hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia or hypomagnesemia from the antiresorptive effect.

Management

Withhold for renal-function decline, hydrate, and provide supportive care; injury is typically reversible. Correct co-existing hypocalcemia/hypophosphatemia. No specific antidote.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • High or rapidly infused IV dose
  • Pre-existing CKD
  • Volume depletion
  • Concurrent nephrotoxins (NSAIDs, aminoglycosides, contrast)

Prevention

  • Adhere to recommended infusion times
  • Dose-reduce or withhold in renal impairment per label
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that inhibits farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase in the mevalonate pathway of osteoclasts, disrupting prenylation of small GTPases (Ras/Rho/Rac), impairing osteoclast cytoskeleton and survival and thereby suppressing bone resorption. Used for malignancy-associated bone disease, hypercalcemia of malignancy and post-menopausal osteoporosis.

§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

Oral/IV for osteoporosis: no adjustment for CrCl ≥30 mL/min; not recommended (or use with caution) below 30 mL/min. Oncology IV dosing should be reduced and infused slowly in renal impairment; withhold for acute decline in renal function and reassess.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Negligible plasma drug at steady state due to rapid bone uptake; not meaningfully dialyzed. In hemodialysis patients a reduced IV dose (e.g., 2 mg) given after dialysis achieves equivalent bone binding (Bergner 2005).

Differential diagnosis

Distinguish drug-related ATN from hypercalcemia-of-malignancy pre-renal AKI (which the bisphosphonate is treating) and from contrast or NSAID injury; collapsing FSGS with heavy proteinuria is classically the pamidronate pattern, but biopsy-proven collapsing FSGS/podocytopathy with nephrotic-range proteinuria has been reported rarely with ibandronate itself (PMIDs 26197890, 38383148), so it does not exclude ibandronate as the cause.

Monitoring

  • Serum calcium, phosphate and magnesium periodically
  • Volume/hydration status around infusion
  • 25-OH vitamin D (replete before starting to avoid hypocalcemia)

Key trials & series

  • The Jackson Oncologist 2005 renal-safety pooled analysis (~4% vs ~4.5% placebo)
  • Markowitz Kidney Int 2003 zoledronate toxic-ATN series (class comparator)

Clinical pearls

  • Ibandronate is the bisphosphonate to choose when renal safety is paramount — its renal-event rate sits at placebo level.
  • Tubular peak concentration (dose ÷ infusion time), not cumulative dose, drives bisphosphonate ATN — never shorten the infusion.
  • In ESKD, exploit high bone avidity: a 2 mg dose binds bone like 4–5 mg in normal kidneys, so dose down.
  • Replete vitamin D and watch calcium — antiresorptive hypocalcemia is the more common 'electrolyte' event than any tubular injury.
Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 1 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the Bisphosphonate class.

Musculoskeletal

Myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis, ONJ

  • Osteonecrosis of the jaw, hypocalcemia, acute-phase reaction
§05

References

7 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Single-patient case reports are listed separately below, graded by strength. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

7 references · 2003–2020 · 1 since 2018
202003: 1 citation2005: 2 citations2008: 2 citations2015: 1 citation2020: 1 citation200320102020

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.Renal safety profiles of ibandronate 6 mg infused over 15 and 60 min: a randomized, open-label study.von Moos R et al. · Ann Oncol · 2008 · PMID 18334511Source of the stored incidence: Two per cent [2/101
  2. 2.Renal safety of ibandronate.Jackson GH et al. · Oncologist · 2005 · PMID 16264108Reports adverse renal events ~4% vs ~4.5% placebo over 2 years; basis for the favorable renal label.
  3. 3.LandmarkBisphosphonate nephrotoxicity.Perazella MA et al. · Kidney Int · 2008 · PMID 18685574Authoritative review: toxic ATN with zoledronate, collapsing FSGS with pamidronate, and the comparatively safe renal profile of ibandronate.
  4. 4.Toxic acute tubular necrosis following treatment with zoledronate (Zometa).Markowitz GS et al. · Kidney Int · 2003 · PMID 12787420Defines the class pattern of bisphosphonate-induced toxic ATN against which ibandronate's lower risk is judged.
  5. 5.Nephrotoxicity of ibandronate and zoledronate in Wistar rats with normal renal function and after unilateral nephrectomy.Bergner R et al. · Pharmacol Res · 2015 · PMID 25976681Experimental comparison showing lower ibandronate tubular toxicity, including an impaired-renal-function model.
  6. 6.High bone-binding capacity of ibandronate in hemodialysis patients.Bergner R et al. · Int J Clin Pharmacol Res · 2005 · PMID 16366420Shows ~98% bone uptake and minimal plasma drug in ESKD; supports reduced post-dialysis dosing.
  7. 7.Is there a role for bisphosphonates in vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease?Hildebrand S et al. · Bone · 2020 · PMID 33188959Reviews bisphosphonate pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and skeletal effects across declining GFR, including ibandronate.
FDA label — boxed warning & renal dosing· renal impairment

Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (Aug 2026) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .

Renal impairment — from the label

Ibandronate sodium is not recommended for use in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min).

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 3,079 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Reporting odds ratio (ROR) — is kidney injury named in this agent's reports more often than in every other drug's? Above 1 means yes, disproportionately.
  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 6 signals

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Glomerular Injury / Proteinuriacorroborated · ROR 3.29 — on the terms that name the lesion (ROR 6.35)
  • Electrolyte Disturbancecorroborated · ROR 1.47 — but the naming terms alone are not disproportionate, so this rests on terms merely consistent with the lesion
  • Acute Tubular NecrosisNot measurable in reporting — Reporters cannot reliably name this lesion, so its absence from FAERS is expected and is not evidence against the documented injury.
Fanconi Syndrome
ROR 14.6995% CI 8.12–26.58· 11 reports
Hemorrhagic Cystitis
ROR 6.9295% CI 5.45–8.79· 69 reports
Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria
ROR 3.2995% CI 1.95–5.56· 14 reports
Hypertension
ROR 2.9795% CI 2.53–3.48· 162 reports
Crystal / Obstructive Nephropathy
ROR 2.8395% CI 1.88–4.26· 23 reports
Electrolyte Disturbance
ROR 1.4795% CI 1.08–2.00· 41 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 9.6% of reports w/ death · 22.4% w/ hospitalization
9.6%

Reported with a death outcome

295 of 3,079 reports

22.4%

Reported with hospitalization

689 of 3,079 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 91 reports
  • 2016: 83 reports
  • 2017: 107 reports
  • 2018: 144 reports
  • 2019: 105 reports
  • 2020: 125 reports
  • 2021: 164 reports
  • 2022: 295 reports
  • 2023: 276 reports
  • 2024: 260 reports
  • 2025: 282 reports
  • 2026: 126 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 8 systems · 3,079 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

Disproportionality (acute kidney injury):ROR 0.8995% CI 0.58–1.39· 20 AKI reports ·no disproportionate AKI reporting signal (CI spans 1).
General / constitutional
Fatigue212Fall176Pain167Asthenia161Back Pain140
Musculoskeletal
Arthralgia261Femur Fracture219Myalgia142Pain In Extremity141Osteonecrosis Of Jaw130
Gastrointestinal
Diarrhoea244Nausea238Vomiting143Abdominal Pain Upper131
Nervous system
Headache217Dizziness178
Respiratory
Dyspnoea154Cough124
Psychiatric
Insomnia124
Skin
Pruritus123
Metabolic & electrolyte
Decreased Appetite99
Guidelines & consensus· 14

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Ibandronate sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Nedaplatin

Aqupla · Platinum agent

Profile

Second-gen platinum with reduced renal toxicity vs cisplatin.

ATNLYTE
Moderate#1 · 68% phenotype match

Imatinib

Gleevec · BCR-ABL TKI

Profile

Fluid retention; rare Fanconi and AKI.

LYTEFANCATN
Mild#2 · 65% phenotype match

Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen)

Pepaxto · Peptide-conjugated alkylator

Profile

Delivers melphalan intracellularly; BRIDGE supports a reduced 30 mg dose in moderate renal impairment.

ATNLYTE
Moderate#3 · 65% phenotype match

Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd)

Datroway · Antibody-drug conjugate (TROP2/DXd)

Profile

2025 TROP2 ADC; renal signal theoretical, extrapolated from the ADC class.

ATNGLOM
Moderate#4 · 64% phenotype match

Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V)

Emrelis · c-Met ADC (MMAE)

Profile

c-Met MMAE antibody-drug conjugate; proximal tubular ATN risk extrapolated from the ADC/MMAE class.

ATNLYTE
Moderate#5 · 64% phenotype match

Carboplatin

Paraplatin · Platinum agent

Profile

Kidney-sparing; GFR-dosed by the Calvert formula.

ATNLYTECYST
Mild#6 · 60% phenotype match
Compare Ibandronate with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across Bisphosphonates & bone

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1Ibandronate· this agentMild
  2. 2DenosumabModerate
  3. 3Zoledronic acidFAERS AKIModerate
  4. 4PamidronateSevere

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.

Who studies this

The leading contributors to Ibandronate’s clinical kidney literature on PubMed, ranked by a blend of publication volume and citation impact — filtered toward clinical work via the PubMed Humans heading and clinical publication types (trials, cohorts, case reports, guidelines, reviews). Names link to that author’s work on Ibandronate; the PMIDs beside each name are up to three of their most recent papers on it, not the full count.

  1. Body, Jean-Jacques — their work on Ibandronate, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)5 papers · 170 citesPMID 17062710 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 15823760 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 15490380 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  2. Diel, Ingo J — their work on Ibandronate, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)4 papers · 186 citesPMID 19089462 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 18240669 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 17068390 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  3. Bergner, Raoul — their work on Ibandronate, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)4 papers · 171 citesPMID 18240669 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 17615253 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 17068390 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  4. Miller, Paul D — their work on Ibandronate, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)2 papers · 122 citesPMID 21945737 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 21232648 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  5. Uppenkamp, Michael — their work on Ibandronate, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)3 papers · 68 citesPMID 17615253 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 17068390 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 17016034 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Ranked by a 50/50 blend of publication volume and a position-weighted, capped Relative Citation Ratio (NIH iCite) on this agent’s renal literature; the citation count shown is the raw total, not the ranking score — counted over the 46 clinical records among all 73 PubMed matches, so counts are within-sample — bibliometric context, not an endorsement or a measure of clinical authority.