Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

Antibody-drug conjugate (CD22/calicheamicin)

Inotuzumab ozogamicin

Besponsa · InO

Antibody-drug conjugate (CD22/calicheamicin) · approved 2017 · 4 citations · FAERS AKI reporting ROR 2.75 (95% CI 2.12–3.57, 58 AKI reports)

Recent· through 2023
Fairly sourced5/9 · 5 signals
  • Not met: 4 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Not met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 7y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Met: Current through 2023
  • Met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

A CD22/calicheamicin conjugate for ALL — tumor lysis and veno-occlusive disease drive its renal risk.

ModerateAntibody-drug conjugate
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
§01

Signature kidney injury

Direct nephrotoxicity is not a prominent signal. AKI is chiefly secondary to tumor lysis and to hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (VOD) — a notable, sometimes fatal complication, particularly around subsequent allogeneic stem-cell transplant. Renal-specific incidence is not quantified.Source: Kantarjian et al., N Engl J Med 2016 (INO-VATE)

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injuryAcute (~1–7 days)

Early — tumor lysis during initial therapy (VOD, non-renal, is peri-transplant).

Distilled from: “Early — tumor lysis during initial therapy; VOD typically peri-transplant.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

  2. Electrolyte DisturbanceSecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Renal electrolyte derangement — magnesium/potassium/calcium wasting (cisplatin, anti-EGFR antibodies) or retention (FGFR-inhibitor hyperphosphatemia, tumor-lysis hyperkalemia/hyperphosphatemia).

  3. Crystal / Obstructive NephropathySecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Intratubular precipitation of drug or metabolite — high-dose methotrexate and tumor lysis crystals.

Toxicity fingerprint

Tap a signature to trace where it strikes the nephron.

Incidence not quantified
SeverityModerate
ReversibilityVariable
Evidence4 citations
Nephron map
Vasculature / Endothelium
Distal Tubule / Collecting Duct
Tubular Lumen

Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI

Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

Indirect: rapid lysis of bulky ALL causes tumor lysis with crystal nephropathy and electrolyte shifts; calicheamicin injury to hepatic sinusoidal endothelium produces VOD with fluid overload and hepatorenal-pattern AKI, with markedly elevated VOD risk after allogeneic transplant (and with dual-alkylator conditioning). Direct tubular toxicity is not a notable clinical signal.

Clinical presentation

Tumor-lysis labs with AKI early in therapy; with VOD, weight gain, ascites, hyperbilirubinemia, hepatomegaly and rising creatinine with low urine sodium, especially in the peri-transplant period.

Management

Tumor-lysis management; for VOD, supportive care and defibrotide with careful fluid/renal management; supportive AKI care including dialysis if severe.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • High leukemic burden
  • Subsequent allogeneic stem-cell transplant
  • Dual-alkylator conditioning
  • Hepatic dysfunction
  • Volume depletion
  • Pre-existing CKD

Prevention

  • Tumor lysis prophylaxis (hydration, allopurinol/rasburicase)
  • Limit cycles before transplant and avoid dual-alkylator conditioning to reduce VOD
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD22 and delivering the DNA-damaging calicheamicin payload via a hydrolyzable linker. Approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Note · Renal injury is mediated by tumor lysis and VOD rather than direct tubular toxicity; VOD risk is heightened around transplant.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No specific renal dose adjustment; decisions are driven by hepatic function/VOD risk rather than renal clearance. Calicheamicin is hepatically handled.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Not appreciably dialyzed (large ADC; protein-bound calicheamicin). HD/CRRT in VOD supports AKI, not drug removal.

Differential diagnosis

Tumor lysis AKI (early, electrolyte signature) versus VOD hepatorenal AKI (jaundice, weight gain, ascites, low urine sodium) versus sepsis/nephrotoxin ATN. VOD risk is the defining peri-transplant concern.

Monitoring

  • LFTs (bilirubin) and daily weight for VOD, especially around transplant
  • Tumor lysis labs during initial therapy
  • Serum creatinine and volume status in evolving VOD

Key trials & series

  • INO-VATE (Kantarjian NEJM 2016, R/R ALL; VOD signal)
  • Jabbour Lancet Haematol 2023 (mini-hyper-CVD + inotuzumab; long-term VOD data)

Clinical pearls

  • Minimize inotuzumab cycles before allogeneic transplant and avoid dual-alkylator conditioning - both reduce the VOD that drives hepatorenal AKI.
  • Like gemtuzumab, the calicheamicin ADCs threaten the kidney via the liver (VOD) and the tumor (lysis), not the tubule.
  • Early defibrotide is the key intervention once VOD with renal involvement is recognized.
Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 4 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the Antibody-drug conjugate (CD22/calicheamicin) class.

Hematologic

Cytopenias, thrombosis, TMA

  • Myelosuppression (payload-dependent)

Ophthalmic

Keratopathy, uveitis, retinopathy

  • Keratopathy (belantamab, mirvetuximab, tisotumab)

Pulmonary

Pneumonitis, ILD, effusions, hypertension

  • Interstitial lung disease (deruxtecan ADCs)

Neurologic

Neuropathy, encephalopathy, ICANS, PRES

  • Peripheral neuropathy (MMAE payloads)
§05

References

4 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

4 references · 2016–2023 · 1 since 2021
202016: 2 citations2018: 1 citation2023: 1 citation201620202023

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.LandmarkInotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Kantarjian HM et al. · N Engl J Med · 2016 · PMID 27292104INO-VATE phase III establishing efficacy and the veno-occlusive disease signal.
  2. 2.Mini-hyper-CVD plus inotuzumab ozogamicin, with or without blinatumomab, in the subgroup of older patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia: long-term results of an open-label phase 2 trial.Jabbour E et al. · Lancet Haematol · 2023 · PMID 37187201Long-term data including VOD with inotuzumab-containing regimens.
  3. 3.Defibrotide sodium for the treatment of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.Richardson PG et al. · Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol · 2018 · PMID 29301447Defibrotide for VOD/SOS with renal/pulmonary dysfunction - the key intervention for VOD-related AKI.
  4. 4.Tumor lysis syndrome in the era of novel and targeted agents in patients with hematologic malignancies: a systematic review.Howard SC et al. · Ann Hematol · 2016 · PMID 26758269TLS risk among novel hematologic agents.
FDA label — boxed warning & renal dosing· boxed warning

Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (Feb 2026) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .

Boxed warning

WARNING: HEPATOTOXICITY, INCLUDING HEPATIC VENO-OCCLUSIVE DISEASE (VOD) (ALSO KNOWN AS SINUSOIDAL OBSTRUCTION SYNDROME) and INCREASED RISK OF POST-HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT (HSCT) NON-RELAPSE MORTALITY WARNING: HEPATOTOXICITY, INCLUDING HEPATIC VENO-OCCLUSIVE DISEASE (VOD) (ALSO KNOWN AS SINUSOIDAL OBSTRUCTION SYNDROME) and INCREASED RISK OF POST- HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT (HSCT) NON-RELAPSE MORTALITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Hepatotoxicity, including fatal and life-threatening VOD occurred in patients who received BESPONSA. ( 5.1 ) • A higher post-HSCT non-relapse mortality rate occurred in patients receiving BESPONSA ( 5.2 ) HEPATOTOXICITY, INCLUDING VOD • Hepatotoxicity, including fatal and life-threatening VOD occurred in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received BESPONSA. The risk of VOD was greater in patients who underwent HSCT after BESPONSA treatment; use of HSCT conditioning regimens containing 2 alkylating agents and last total bilirubin level ≥ upper limit of normal (ULN) before HSCT were significantly associated with an increased risk of VOD. • Other risk factors for VOD in patients treated with BESPONSA included ongoing or prior liver disease, prior HSCT, increased age, later salvage lines, and a greater number of BESPONSA treatment cycles. • Elevation of liver…

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 2,937 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Reporting odds ratio (ROR) — is kidney injury named in this agent's reports more often than in every other drug's? Above 1 means yes, disproportionately.
  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 4 signals

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Electrolyte Disturbancecorroborated · ROR 3.12 — on the terms that name the lesion (ROR 4.65)
  • Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKINot queried in FAERS — No MedDRA term set is defined for this phenotype, so FAERS was never asked about it.
  • Crystal / Obstructive NephropathyNo disproportionate reporting — This phenotype IS reportable and this agent has enough reports, yet the reporting is not disproportionate — the one genuinely informative negative of the four.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy
ROR 14.4695% CI 10.15–20.61· 31 reports
SIADH / Hyponatremia
ROR 5.0495% CI 3.87–6.57· 56 reports
Electrolyte Disturbance
ROR 3.1295% CI 2.51–3.89· 82 reports
Hemorrhagic Cystitis
ROR 2.6995% CI 1.83–3.96· 26 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 33.9% of reports w/ death · 40.3% w/ hospitalization
33.9%

Reported with a death outcome

996 of 2,937 reports

40.3%

Reported with hospitalization

1,184 of 2,937 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 71 reports
  • 2016: 78 reports
  • 2017: 77 reports
  • 2018: 245 reports
  • 2019: 251 reports
  • 2020: 255 reports
  • 2021: 368 reports
  • 2022: 365 reports
  • 2023: 350 reports
  • 2024: 342 reports
  • 2025: 254 reports
  • 2026: 123 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 7 systems · 2,937 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

Disproportionality (acute kidney injury):ROR 2.7595% CI 2.12–3.57· 58 AKI reports ·AKI is reported disproportionately more often than for other drugs (CI entirely above 1) — a hypothesis-generating signal, not proof of causation.
Renal & urinary
Acute Kidney Injury58
Blood & lymphatic
Febrile Neutropenia265Thrombocytopenia148Platelet Count Decreased121Neutropenia118Anaemia79
Hepatobiliary
Venoocclusive Liver Disease258Venoocclusive Disease132Blood Bilirubin Increased82Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased57
Immune / infection
Sepsis136Cytokine Release Syndrome133Pneumonia96Infection93
General / constitutional
Pyrexia192Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome81Fatigue69
Gastrointestinal
Nausea74Diarrhoea66
Nervous system
Neurotoxicity55
Guidelines & consensus· 13

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Inotuzumab ozogamicin sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin

Mylotarg · Antibody-drug conjugate (CD33/calicheamicin)

Profile

Tumor lysis and veno-occlusive disease.

PRELYTEXTAL
Moderate#1 · 100% phenotype match

Brentuximab vedotin

Adcetris · Antibody-drug conjugate (CD30/MMAE)

Profile

Tumor lysis in lymphoma.

PRELYTEXTAL
Mild#2 · 95% phenotype match

Polatuzumab vedotin

Polivy · Antibody-drug conjugate (CD79b/MMAE)

Profile

Tumor lysis; emerging renal data.

PRELYTEXTAL
Mild#3 · 95% phenotype match

Epcoritamab

Epkinly · Bispecific (CD20×CD3)

Profile

CRS and tumor lysis — emerging.

PRELYTEXTAL
Moderate#4 · 89% phenotype match

Glofitamab

Columvi · Bispecific (CD20×CD3)

Profile

CRS and tumor lysis — emerging.

PRELYTEXTAL
Moderate#5 · 89% phenotype match

Mosunetuzumab

Lunsumio · Bispecific (CD20×CD3)

Profile

CRS and tumor lysis in lymphoma.

PRELYTEXTAL
Moderate#6 · 89% phenotype match
Compare Inotuzumab ozogamicin with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across Antibody-drug conjugates

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1Mirvetuximab soravtansineMild
  2. 2Belantamab mafodotinFAERS AKIMild
  3. 3Tisotumab vedotinFAERS AKIMild
  4. 4Brentuximab vedotinFAERS AKIMild
  5. 5Polatuzumab vedotinFAERS AKIMild
  6. 6Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd)Moderate
  7. 7Loncastuximab tesirineModerate
  8. 8Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V)Moderate
  9. 9Sacituzumab govitecanModerate
  10. 10Trastuzumab deruxtecanModerate
  11. 11Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)Moderate
  12. 12Pivekimab sunirineModerate
  13. 13Enfortumab vedotinFAERS AKIModerate
  14. 14Gemtuzumab ozogamicinFAERS AKIModerate
  15. 15Inotuzumab ozogamicin· this agentFAERS AKIModerate

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.