Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

Immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)

Lenalidomide

Revlimid · LEN

Immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) · approved 2005 · 9 citations

Up to date· through 2025
Deeply sourced7/9 · 6 signals
  • Met: 9 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 18y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Met: Current through 2025
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

A renally cleared immunomodulatory drug where dose adjustment by CrCl is central and AKI, Fanconi, and tumor flare can complicate kidney care.

ModerateImmunomodulatory drug (IMiD)
Multiple myelomaMyelodysplastic syndrome with del(5q)Mantle cell lymphomaFollicular and marginal zone lymphoma
§01

Signature kidney injury

Signature lesion

AKI/azotemia is uncommon but recognized, described mainly in case series of plasma-cell dyscrasias with underlying renal insufficiency; not reliably quantified as an incidence. Rare Fanconi syndrome and TMA are reported. Because ~80% of lenalidomide is renally cleared as unchanged drug, accumulation in renal impairment is the dominant driver of toxicity, including myelosuppression.Source: Batts et al., Leuk Lymphoma 2008; PK Chen et al., J Clin Pharmacol 2007

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injuryVariable / unpredictable

Azotemia reported from weeks to several months after initiation.

Distilled from: “Variable; azotemia reported from weeks to several months after initiation.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Acute Tubular Necrosis#1 · Signatureno population incidence denominator

    AKI, including acute tubular necrosis and acute interstitial nephritis, is the predominant lenalidomide renal toxicity PMID 26927826 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

  2. Fanconi SyndromeRarequalitative — no citable incidence

    Global failure of proximal tubule reabsorption — glucosuria, phosphaturia and acidosis, classically from ifosfamide.

  3. Thrombotic MicroangiopathyRarequalitative — no citable incidence

    Endothelial injury with microvascular thrombi, hemolysis and thrombocytopenia — gemcitabine, mitomycin C, anti-VEGF.

Toxicity fingerprint

Tap a signature to trace where it strikes the nephron.

Incidence not quantified
SeverityModerate
ReversibilityVariable
Evidence9 citations
Nephron map
Glomerulus
Vasculature / Endothelium
Proximal TubuleBulk reabsorption + drug uptake (OCT2, OATs)
Distal Tubule / Collecting DuctFine-tuning of Na, K, Mg, acid & water
Interstitium

Acute Tubular Necrosis

Direct death of tubular epithelial cells — the dose-limiting lesion of the platinums and zoledronate.

§03

Kidney injury

Appears in 1 documented synergy combination

Mechanism of kidney injury

Mechanisms are incompletely defined. Lenalidomide is eliminated predominantly by glomerular filtration and renal tubular secretion as unchanged drug, so reduced clearance in CKD raises systemic exposure (AUC increased ~185-420% across moderate-to-severe impairment) and amplifies toxicity. Proposed renal-specific contributors include proximal tubular injury (occasionally a Fanconi pattern with phosphate and amino-acid wasting), the combined nephrotoxic burden of paraproteins plus an anti-angiogenic agent, and rarely tumor flare/tumor lysis and TMA.

Clinical presentation

Rising creatinine/azotemia, sometimes progressing to dialysis; rare proximal tubular dysfunction (glucosuria with normoglycemia, hypophosphatemia, aminoaciduria) or TMA features (schistocytes, thrombocytopenia). Tumor flare may present with painful lymphadenopathy and rising LDH early in CLL/lymphoma treatment.

Management

Hold or dose-reduce for AKI and treat reversible contributors (volume, paraprotein, nephrotoxins); monitor renal function and electrolytes. Some cases are irreversible and require dialysis, so early recognition and CrCl-based dose adjustment are essential. For TMA, stop the drug and manage supportively.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • Pre-existing renal insufficiency (drives exposure and toxicity)
  • Plasma-cell dyscrasia with nephrotoxic paraproteins
  • Fixed (non-adjusted) dosing in reduced renal function
  • High tumor burden (tumor flare/lysis)

Prevention

  • Adjust starting dose to creatinine clearance (see dosing)
  • Maintain hydration; tumor-lysis precautions in high-burden disease
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Thalidomide analog that binds cereblon to redirect the CRL4 E3 ubiquitin ligase, triggering ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the transcription factors IKZF1 (Ikaros) and IKZF3 (Aiolos); this produces direct antimyeloma, anti-angiogenic, and T/NK-cell immunostimulatory effects. Used in multiple myeloma, del(5q) MDS, and certain lymphomas.

Note · Renally cleared - dose adjustment by creatinine clearance is central. AKI incidence is not well quantified and is described at the case-series level.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

Per pharmacokinetic data, adjust the starting dose when CrCl <60 mL/min (myeloma labeling): CrCl 30-60 use ~10 mg daily; CrCl <30 not on dialysis use 15 mg every other day; on dialysis use 5 mg once daily, given after dialysis on dialysis days. Disease-specific labels differ; titrate to tolerance.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Yes, lenalidomide is removed by hemodialysis - a 4-hour session cleared ~31% of body drug content. Administer the daily dose after the dialysis session on dialysis days.

Differential diagnosis

Separate drug accumulation/ATN from myeloma cast nephropathy (look for the paraprotein and free light chains), from prerenal azotemia (volume responsive), and from rare lenalidomide TMA (MAHA triad). A Fanconi pattern (normoglycemic glucosuria, phosphaturia, LMW proteinuria) points to proximal tubular toxicity.

Monitoring

  • Serum creatinine/CrCl at baseline and before dose escalation
  • CBC (cytopenias track exposure) at least monthly
  • Electrolytes including phosphate if tubular dysfunction suspected
  • Tumor-lysis labs early in high-burden disease

Key trials & series

  • Chen et al. renal-impairment pharmacokinetic/hemodialysis study (J Clin Pharmacol 2007)
  • Batts et al. azotemia case series (Leuk Lymphoma 2008)

Clinical pearls

  • Lenalidomide is renally cleared - always dose by CrCl and give after dialysis; failing to adjust causes both cytopenias and worsening renal function.
  • Unlike pomalidomide, lenalidomide exposure rises sharply in CKD, so the two IMiDs are not interchangeable in renal impairment.
  • New thrombocytopenia plus AKI on lenalidomide should prompt a smear to exclude TMA.
Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 3 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the Immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) class.

Vascular

Hypertension, VTE/ATE, bleeding, aneurysm

  • Venous thromboembolism

Hematologic

Cytopenias, thrombosis, TMA

  • Myelosuppression

Neurologic

Neuropathy, encephalopathy, ICANS, PRES

  • Neuropathy (thalidomide)
§05

References

6 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Single-patient case reports are listed separately below, graded by strength. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

6 references · 2007–2025 · 1 since 2023
102007: 1 citation2008: 1 citation2013: 1 citation2015: 1 citation2016: 1 citation2025: 1 citation2007201020202025

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.LandmarkAzotemia associated with use of lenalidomide in plasma cell dyscrasias.Batts ED et al. · Leuk Lymphoma · 2008 · PMID 18452093Case series of progressive azotemia (including a Fanconi-syndrome patient) on lenalidomide.
  2. 2.Pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment and in subjects on hemodialysis.Chen N et al. · J Clin Pharmacol · 2007 · PMID 17954615Defines the renal clearance of lenalidomide, the AUC rise in CKD, hemodialysis removal (~31%), and the basis for dose adjustment.
  3. 3.Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and moderate renal impairment: a pooled analysis of three clinical trials.Siegel DS et al. · Leuk Lymphoma · 2016 · PMID 27267105Pooled trials showing pomalidomide safe and effective in moderate renal impairment, cited to contrast with lenalidomide's renal clearance.
  4. 4.Lenalidomide and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Gonzalez-Rodriguez AP et al. · Biomed Res Int · 2013 · PMID 24163824Reviews lenalidomide toxicity including tumor lysis and tumor flare reaction.
  5. 5.New drug toxicities in the onco-nephrology world.Perazella MA et al. · Kidney Int · 2015 · PMID 25671763Onco-nephrology review of newer anticancer-agent renal effects, including immunomodulatory and targeted drugs.
  6. 6.Pharmacological nephrotoxicity profile in a comprehensive cancer center: What changed in two decades and predictors for the need for haemodialysis and mortality.Ferreira A et al. · Nefrologia (Engl Ed) · 2025 · PMID 40783302Cancer-center AKI series contextualizing drug-induced AKI requiring dialysis in hematologic malignancy.
FDA label — boxed warning & renal dosing· boxed warning · renal impairment

Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (May 2026) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .

Boxed warning

WARNING: EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY, HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY, and VENOUS and ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLISM Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Do not use lenalidomide capsules during pregnancy. Lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, caused limb abnormalities in a developmental monkey study. Thalidomide is a known human teratogen that causes severe life-threatening human birth defects. If lenalidomide is used during pregnancy, it may cause birth defects or embryo-fetal death. In females of reproductive potential, obtain 2 negative pregnancy tests before starting lenalidomide treatment. Females of reproductive potential must use 2 forms of contraception or continuously abstain from heterosexual sex during and for 4 weeks after lenalidomide capsules treatment [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ), and Medication Guide ( 17 )] . To avoid embryo-fetal exposure to lenalidomide, lenalidomide capsules are only available through a restricted distribution program, the Lenalidomide REMS program ( 5.2 ). Information about the Lenalidomide REMS program is available at www.lenalidomiderems.com or by calling the REMS Call Center at 1-888-423-5436. Hematologic Toxicity (Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia) Lenalidomide capsules can cause significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Eighty percent of patients with del 5q myelodysplastic syndromes had to have a dose delay/reduction during the major study. Thirty-four…

Renal impairment — from the label

Adjust the starting dose of lenalidomide capsules based on the creatinine clearance value and for patients on dialysis [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.6 )] .

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 420,081 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Reporting odds ratio (ROR) — is kidney injury named in this agent's reports more often than in every other drug's? Above 1 means yes, disproportionately.
  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 1 signal

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Thrombotic Microangiopathycorroborated · ROR 1.13
  • Acute Tubular NecrosisNot measurable in reporting — Reporters cannot reliably name this lesion, so its absence from FAERS is expected and is not evidence against the documented injury.
  • Fanconi SyndromeNo disproportionate reporting — This phenotype IS reportable and this agent has enough reports, yet the reporting is not disproportionate — the one genuinely informative negative of the four.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy
ROR 1.1395% CI 1.01–1.25· 349 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 12.8% of reports w/ death · 26% w/ hospitalization
12.8%

Reported with a death outcome

53,762 of 420,081 reports

26%

Reported with hospitalization

109,167 of 420,081 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 34,550 reports
  • 2016: 25,534 reports
  • 2017: 28,602 reports
  • 2018: 26,535 reports
  • 2019: 30,129 reports
  • 2020: 33,935 reports
  • 2021: 52,556 reports
  • 2022: 43,269 reports
  • 2023: 29,356 reports
  • 2024: 30,439 reports
  • 2025: 23,900 reports
  • 2026: 10,856 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 9 systems · 420,081 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

Disproportionality (acute kidney injury):ROR 0.7795% CI 0.74–0.80· 2,362 AKI reports ·AKI is reported less often than for other drugs (CI entirely below 1) — no disproportionate signal.
General / constitutional
Fatigue26,785Asthenia10,124Fall7,514Pyrexia7,262Peripheral Swelling6,764
Gastrointestinal
Diarrhoea31,469Constipation11,085Nausea10,891
Blood & lymphatic
White Blood Cell Count Decreased11,893Platelet Count Decreased9,592Neutropenia9,298Anaemia7,495Thrombocytopenia6,628
Skin
Rash18,227Pruritus7,423
Immune / infection
Pneumonia18,842Covid-196,576
Nervous system
Neuropathy Peripheral12,164Dizziness7,284
Musculoskeletal
Muscle Spasms7,761
Respiratory
Dyspnoea7,675
Vascular
Thrombosis7,546
Guidelines & consensus· 13

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Lenalidomide sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Zoledronic acid

Zometa · Bisphosphonate

Profile

Toxic ATN, infusion-rate dependent.

ATNFANC
Moderate#1 · 62% phenotype match

Vemurafenib

Zelboraf · BRAF inhibitor

Profile

Strongest renal offender of the BRAF/MEK class: proximal tubular injury/Fanconi and early AKI.

ATNFANCLYTE
Moderate#2 · 58% phenotype match

Trastuzumab deruxtecan

Enhertu · Antibody-drug conjugate (HER2/DXd)

Profile

Emerging AKI/proteinuria reports — under-published.

ATNFANCLYTE
Moderate#3 · 54% phenotype match

Oxaliplatin

Eloxatin · Platinum agent

Profile

Least nephrotoxic platinum; rare immune hemolysis.

TMAATN
Mild#4 · 52% phenotype match

BRAF / MEK inhibitors (vemurafenib · dabrafenib · trametinib)

BRAF/MEK inhibitor

Profile

Tubulointerstitial AKI; vemurafenib strongest.

ATNAINLYTE
Mild#5 · 52% phenotype match

Procarbazine

Matulane · Hydrazine alkylating agent

Profile

Classic cytotoxic with recognized renal/urological complications; AKI usually multifactorial; hypersensitivity AIN possible.

ATNAIN
Moderate#6 · 51% phenotype match
Compare Lenalidomide with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across Other targeted agents

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1BelzutifanMild
  2. 2CasdatifanMild
  3. 3DordaviproneMild
  4. 4IberdomideMild
  5. 5RucaparibMild
  6. 6SonidegibMild
  7. 7TalazoparibMild
  8. 8GlasdegibMild
  9. 9ImetelstatMild
  10. 10NiraparibMild
  11. 11NirogacestatMild
  12. 12OlaparibMild
  13. 13RelacorilantMild
  14. 14SotorasibMild
  15. 15TazemetostatMild
  16. 16VismodegibMild
  17. 17VorasidenibMild
  18. 18PomalidomideMild
  19. 19ThalidomideMild
  20. 20AdagrasibFAERS AKIMild
  21. 21Denileukin diftitoxModerate
  22. 22Afamitresgene autoleucel (Afami-cel)Moderate
  23. 23OlutasidenibModerate
  24. 24ZiftomenibModerate
  25. 25EnasidenibModerate
  26. 26Gallium nitrateModerate
  27. 27IvosidenibModerate
  28. 28Lenalidomide· this agentModerate
  29. 29RevumenibModerate
  30. 30IxazomibFAERS AKIModerate
  31. 31BortezomibFAERS AKIModerate
  32. 32TagraxofuspFAERS AKIModerate
  33. 33Tretinoin (ATRA)FAERS AKIModerate
  34. 34Arsenic trioxideFAERS AKIModerate
  35. 35LifileucelFAERS AKIModerate
  36. 36SelinexorFAERS AKIModerate
  37. 37Moxetumomab pasudotoxSevere
  38. 38SonrotoclaxSevere
  39. 39CarfilzomibFAERS AKISevere
  40. 40VenetoclaxFAERS AKISevere

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.

Who studies this

The leading contributors to Lenalidomide’s clinical kidney literature on PubMed, ranked by a blend of publication volume and citation impact — filtered toward clinical work via the PubMed Humans heading and clinical publication types (trials, cohorts, case reports, guidelines, reviews). Names link to that author’s work on Lenalidomide; the PMIDs beside each name are up to three of their most recent papers on it, not the full count.

  1. Dimopoulos, Meletios A — their work on Lenalidomide, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)10 papers · 1,058 citesPMID 38298023 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 29341834 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 28370245 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  2. Terpos, Evangelos — their work on Lenalidomide, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)11 papers · 1,089 citesPMID 40926508 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 38937492 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 38298023 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  3. Goldschmidt, Hartmut — their work on Lenalidomide, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)5 papers · 712 citesPMID 36328040 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 34967910 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 34341985 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  4. Ludwig, Heinz — their work on Lenalidomide, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)5 papers · 894 citesPMID 29341834 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 26976420 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 25398836 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  5. Richardson, Paul G — their work on Lenalidomide, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)5 papers · 715 citesPMID 38677302 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 26976420 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 22272706 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Ranked by a 50/50 blend of publication volume and a position-weighted, capped Relative Citation Ratio (NIH iCite) on this agent’s renal literature; the citation count shown is the raw total, not the ranking score — counted over the 144 clinical records among all 177 PubMed matches, so counts are within-sample — bibliometric context, not an endorsement or a measure of clinical authority.