Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

IDH1 inhibitor

Olutasidenib

Rezlidhi · OLU

IDH1 inhibitor · approved 2022 · 6 citations

Up to date· through 2025
Deeply sourced7/9 · 6 signals
  • Met: 6 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 15y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Met: Current through 2025
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

Mutant-IDH1 inhibitor for AML whose differentiation syndrome and tumor lysis are the renal threats — a maturation-driven, not tubular, kidney risk.

ModerateMutant-IDH-inhibitor era
Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with a susceptible IDH1 (R132) mutation
§01

Signature kidney injury

Differentiation syndrome (boxed warning) occurred in ~14% of patients (grade >=3 ~9%, with rare fatality) in the pivotal cohort; tumor lysis is a labeled risk. Discrete AKI incidence is not separately quantified and is largely consequent on these syndromes.Source: de Botton et al., Blood Adv 2023 (pivotal R/R AML cohort; ~14% differentiation syndrome — the AKI is a downstream complication, not a primary rate)

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injuryAcute (~1–7 days)

Tumor lysis early in treatment.

Distilled from: “Differentiation syndrome within days to a few months (often early); tumor lysis early in treatment.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

  2. Electrolyte DisturbanceSecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Renal electrolyte derangement — magnesium/potassium/calcium wasting (cisplatin, anti-EGFR antibodies) or retention (FGFR-inhibitor hyperphosphatemia, tumor-lysis hyperkalemia/hyperphosphatemia).

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

Olutasidenib's renal threats are differentiation-driven, analogous to other IDH/FLT3 inhibitors. (1) Differentiation syndrome: rapid blast maturation releases inflammatory cytokines causing fever, capillary-leak edema, effusions, hypotension and acute kidney injury (mixed prerenal hypoperfusion and intrarenal inflammatory injury). (2) Tumor lysis syndrome: cytoreduction releases uric acid, phosphate and potassium, producing urate and calcium-phosphate intratubular crystal nephropathy and ATN. There is no characteristic direct tubular drug toxicity.

Clinical presentation

Differentiation syndrome: dyspnea, fever, weight gain/edema, pleural/pericardial effusions, hypotension and rising creatinine, typically within the first weeks-to-months. TLS: hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia and AKI early in treatment.

Management

For differentiation syndrome: start corticosteroids (dexamethasone) promptly, use diuretics for fluid overload, hold olutasidenib if severe, and support kidney function. For TLS: aggressive IV hydration, rasburicase for hyperuricemia, electrolyte correction and dialysis for refractory derangement. Renal injury generally reverses with timely treatment of the underlying syndrome.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • High leukemic burden/blast count (differentiation syndrome and TLS)
  • Pre-existing CKD and concurrent nephrotoxins
  • Rapid responders early in therapy
  • Concurrent QT-prolonging drugs and electrolyte depletion

Prevention

  • Vigilance for differentiation-syndrome symptoms; early corticosteroids and, if needed, drug interruption
  • TLS prophylaxis: hydration plus allopurinol or rasburicase by risk
  • Frequent blood-chemistry monitoring; correct potassium/magnesium
  • Treat fluid overload with diuretics
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Oral selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1, R132). It blocks the neomorphic production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate, relieving the differentiation block so leukemic blasts mature, inducing remission in mIDH1 AML.

Note · The renal link is indirect but clinically important — AKI arises from differentiation syndrome and tumor lysis rather than a primary tubular drug toxicity. The differentiation-syndrome rate (~14%) is real and quantified from the pivotal cohort.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No dose adjustment for mild-moderate renal impairment; severe impairment/ESKD not well characterized (hepatic metabolism). Interruptions are driven by differentiation syndrome/TLS rather than GFR.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Highly protein-bound; not appreciably dialyzable. Dialysis is used for TLS metabolic complications, not drug removal.

Differential diagnosis

Distinguish differentiation-syndrome AKI (capillary leak, effusions, steroid-responsive) from sepsis/ATN, TLS crystalline nephropathy (early hyperuricemia/hyperphosphatemia), and prerenal azotemia. The maturation-driven systemic syndrome is the clue.

Monitoring

  • Blood chemistries (potassium, phosphate, uric acid, creatinine) frequently, especially early
  • Daily weight and assessment for edema/effusions (differentiation syndrome)
  • Liver tests and ECG/QTc periodically
  • Volume status and blood pressure

Key trials & series

  • Pivotal phase 2 R/R AML cohort (de Botton, Blood Adv 2023) — registrational dataset with the differentiation-syndrome (~14%) signal

Clinical pearls

  • Differentiation syndrome is the boxed warning — recognize early (dyspnea, edema, fever) and treat with dexamethasone before organ failure.
  • Like other IDH/FLT3 inhibitors, the renal hazard is differentiation-driven, not a direct tubular toxicity.
  • Tumor lysis is an early renal hazard in responders — risk-stratify and pre-treat.
  • Frequent electrolyte monitoring guards both the kidney and the QT interval.
Where it strikes· nephron segments & injury signatures

Nephron segments

Vasculature / Endothelium

Glomerular & peritubular capillaries

Tubular Lumen

The urine flow path

Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 2 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the IDH1 inhibitor class.

Pulmonary

Pneumonitis, ILD, effusions, hypertension

  • Differentiation syndrome

Cardiac

Cardiomyopathy, QT, ischemia, myocarditis

  • QT prolongation
§05

References

6 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

6 references · 2010–2025 · 3 since 2023
202010: 1 citation2020: 2 citations2023: 1 citation2024: 1 citation2025: 1 citation201020202025

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.LandmarkOlutasidenib (FT-2102) induces durable complete remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutated AML.de Botton S et al. · Blood Adv · 2023 · PMID 36724515Pivotal registrational cohort quantifying differentiation syndrome (~14%) and the efficacy that drives tumor-lysis risk.
  2. 2.Olutasidenib: a novel mutant IDH1 inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.Cortes JE et al. · Expert Rev Hematol · 2024 · PMID 38747392Drug review emphasizing differentiation syndrome and safety management.
  3. 3.Olutasidenib alone or combined with azacitidine in patients with mutant IDH1 myelodysplastic syndrome.Cortes JE et al. · Blood Adv · 2025 · PMID 40668616Extended dataset confirming differentiation syndrome and QT signals across mIDH1 disease.
  4. 4.Prevention and Treatment of Tumor Lysis Syndrome in the Era of Onco-Nephrology Progress.Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J et al. · Kidney Blood Press Res · 2020 · PMID 32998135Onco-nephrology framework for tumor-lysis-syndrome AKI, the mechanism underlying olutasidenib's labeled TLS risk.
  5. 5.Recommendations for the evaluation of risk and prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) in adults and children with malignant diseases: an expert TLS panel consensus.Cairo MS et al. · Br J Haematol · 2010 · PMID 20331465Consensus TLS prophylaxis/management applicable to IDH1-inhibitor-induced cytoreduction.
  6. 6.KDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantation.Malyszko J et al. · Kidney Int · 2020 · PMID 33276867KDIGO controversies reference on kidney disease in hematological malignancies, framing AKI/CKD risk in the AML population treated with olutasidenib.
FDA label — boxed warning & renal dosing· boxed warning · renal impairment

Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (Nov 2025) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .

Boxed warning

WARNING: DIFFERENTIATION SYNDROME Differentiation syndrome, which can be fatal, can occur with REZLIDHIA treatment. Symptoms may include dyspnea, pulmonary infiltrates/pleuropericardial effusion, kidney injury, hypotension, fever, and weight gain. If differentiation syndrome is suspected, withhold REZLIDHIA and initiate treatment with corticosteroids and hemodynamic monitoring until symptom resolution [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] . WARNING: DIFFERENTIATION SYNDROME See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Differentiation syndrome, which can be fatal, can occur with REZLIDHIA treatment. If differentiation syndrome is suspected, withhold REZLIDHIA and initiate corticosteroids and hemodynamic monitoring until symptom resolution. ( 5.1 )

Renal impairment — from the label

No dosage modification is recommended for patients with mild to moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CLcr] 30 to <90 mL/min, as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault). The recommended dosage of REZLIDHIA has not been established in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr 15 to 29 mL/min as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault), kidney failure (CLcr <15 mL/min, as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault), and patients on dialysis [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] .

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 275 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 15.3% of reports w/ death · 37.8% w/ hospitalization
15.3%

Reported with a death outcome

42 of 275 reports

37.8%

Reported with hospitalization

104 of 275 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 0 reports
  • 2016: 0 reports
  • 2017: 0 reports
  • 2018: 0 reports
  • 2019: 0 reports
  • 2020: 0 reports
  • 2021: 0 reports
  • 2022: 0 reports
  • 2023: 41 reports
  • 2024: 91 reports
  • 2025: 111 reports
  • 2026: 32 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 8 systems · 275 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

Gastrointestinal
Nausea27Constipation17Vomiting9Abdominal Discomfort8Diarrhoea7
General / constitutional
Fatigue26Asthenia7Malaise7
Immune / infection
Pneumonia10
Respiratory
Dyspnoea9
Metabolic & electrolyte
Decreased Appetite7
Skin
Rash7
Hepatobiliary
Hepatic Enzyme Increased6
Blood & lymphatic
White Blood Cell Count Decreased6
Guidelines & consensus· 13

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Olutasidenib sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Tazemetostat

Tazverik · EZH2 inhibitor

Profile

Tumor lysis; generally low direct renal toxicity.

PRELYTE
Mild#1 · 94% phenotype match

Obecabtagene autoleucel (Obe-cel)

Aucatzyl · CD19 CAR-T cell therapy

Profile

CD19 CAR-T for adult B-ALL; CRS- and tumor-lysis-associated AKI, with notably lower high-grade CRS.

PRELYTE
Moderate#2 · 89% phenotype match

Gilteritinib

Xospata · FLT3 inhibitor

Profile

Differentiation syndrome, tumor lysis and PRES in AML.

PRELYTE
Moderate#3 · 89% phenotype match

Afamitresgene autoleucel (Afami-cel)

Tecelra · MAGE-A4 TCR-T cell therapy

Profile

First TCR-T cell therapy for a solid tumor; CRS-associated hemodynamic AKI.

PRELYTE
Moderate#4 · 88% phenotype match

Ziftomenib

Komzifti · Menin inhibitor

Profile

2025 NPM1-mutated AML menin inhibitor; differentiation syndrome and tumor lysis.

PRELYTE
Moderate#5 · 88% phenotype match

Tafasitamab

Monjuvi · Anti-CD19 antibody

Profile

Tumor lysis and infusion reactions in lymphoma.

PRELYTE
Mild#6 · 83% phenotype match
Compare Olutasidenib with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across Other targeted agents

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1BelzutifanMild
  2. 2CasdatifanMild
  3. 3DordaviproneMild
  4. 4IberdomideMild
  5. 5RucaparibMild
  6. 6SonidegibMild
  7. 7TalazoparibMild
  8. 8GlasdegibMild
  9. 9ImetelstatMild
  10. 10NiraparibMild
  11. 11NirogacestatMild
  12. 12OlaparibMild
  13. 13RelacorilantMild
  14. 14SotorasibMild
  15. 15TazemetostatMild
  16. 16VismodegibMild
  17. 17VorasidenibMild
  18. 18PomalidomideMild
  19. 19ThalidomideMild
  20. 20AdagrasibFAERS AKIMild
  21. 21Denileukin diftitoxModerate
  22. 22Afamitresgene autoleucel (Afami-cel)Moderate
  23. 23Olutasidenib· this agentModerate
  24. 24ZiftomenibModerate
  25. 25EnasidenibModerate
  26. 26Gallium nitrateModerate
  27. 27IvosidenibModerate
  28. 28LenalidomideModerate
  29. 29RevumenibModerate
  30. 30IxazomibFAERS AKIModerate
  31. 31BortezomibFAERS AKIModerate
  32. 32TagraxofuspFAERS AKIModerate
  33. 33Tretinoin (ATRA)FAERS AKIModerate
  34. 34Arsenic trioxideFAERS AKIModerate
  35. 35LifileucelFAERS AKIModerate
  36. 36SelinexorFAERS AKIModerate
  37. 37Moxetumomab pasudotoxSevere
  38. 38SonrotoclaxSevere
  39. 39CarfilzomibFAERS AKISevere
  40. 40VenetoclaxFAERS AKISevere

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.