Dordaviprone
Modeyso · Imipridone (ONC201; DRD2/ClpP)
2025 imipridone for H3 K27M glioma; renally well tolerated — QT prolongation, not nephrotoxicity, is the safety focus.
Type II pan-RAF (BRAF) inhibitor
Ojemda · TOVO
Type II pan-RAF (BRAF) inhibitor · approved 2024 · 4 citations
Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.
A pediatric type II RAF inhibitor for BRAF-altered glioma — kidney signal limited to modest creatinine shifts.
Signature lesion
No established intrinsic nephrotoxicity. In FIREFLY-1 the prominent toxicities were hair-color change, rash, anemia and fatigue; renal events were not a defining signal, and any creatinine elevation is described qualitatively rather than as a quantified AKI rate.Source: Kilburn et al., Nat Med 2023
Not well defined; any change emerges during ongoing therapy rather than at a fixed onset.
Distilled from: “Not well defined; any change emerges during ongoing therapy rather than at a fixed onset.”
This agent's defining kidney lesion — its #1 signature. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.
Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.
Oral type II pan-RAF inhibitor that blocks both monomeric and dimeric RAF signaling in the MAPK/ERK pathway, overcoming paradoxical activation seen with type I RAF inhibitors. Approved for relapsed/refractory pediatric low-grade glioma harboring BRAF fusions/rearrangements or BRAF V600 mutation.
Vasculature / Endothelium
Glomerular & peritubular capillaries
Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of the Type II pan-RAF (BRAF) inhibitor class.
Dermatologic
Rash, HFS, SJS/TEN, vitiligo
Cardiac
Cardiomyopathy, QT, ischemia, myocarditis
Ophthalmic
Keratopathy, uveitis, retinopathy
Vascular
Hypertension, VTE/ATE, bleeding, aneurysm
4 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.
Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.
Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (Sep 2025) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .
Renal impairment — from the label
No dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 calculated by Schwartz equation or MDRD equation). OJEMDA has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] .
Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 292 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.
Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.
What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions
Reported with a death outcome
12 of 292 reports
Reported with hospitalization
34 of 292 reports
Reports per year
Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.
Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.
Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.
General onco-nephrology references
Where Tovorafenib sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.
Modeyso · Imipridone (ONC201; DRD2/ClpP)
2025 imipridone for H3 K27M glioma; renally well tolerated — QT prolongation, not nephrotoxicity, is the safety focus.
Orserdu · Oral selective estrogen-receptor degrader (SERD)
2023 oral SERD; nausea-dominant, minimal intrinsic nephrotoxicity.
Zenbexus · Cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD)
2026 first-in-class CELMoD; no attributable lesion (renal impairment 11% vs 8% on the comparator arm) but exposure rises 1.8x below eGFR 30 off dialysis.
Veppanu · PROTAC estrogen-receptor degrader
2026 first PROTAC ER degrader; no meaningful intrinsic renal signal.
Jideytro · ROS1-selective TKI
2026 TRK-sparing ROS1 TKI; no creatinine abnormality reached the label's >=20% lab-table cutoff — unlike the class's benign pseudo-AKI rise. Renally quiet so far.
HIF-2α inhibitor (investigational)
Trial-stage RCC HIF-2α inhibitor; renal profile being defined.
Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.
Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.
A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.