Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

CSF1R tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Vimseltinib

Romvimza · CSF1R TKI

CSF1R tyrosine kinase inhibitor · approved 2025 · 5 citations

Up to date· through 2025
Fairly sourced4/9 · 4 signals
  • Not met: 5 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Not met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 5y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Met: Current through 2025
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

A clean-kidney targeted TKI — watch the CPK, not the nephron.

Mild2023-2026 targeted-therapy era
Symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) not amenable to surgical resection (US accelerated/standard approval, 2025)
§01

Signature kidney injury

Signature lesion

No clinically significant direct nephrotoxicity was identified in the pivotal MOTION phase 3 trial. There is no recognized signature renal lesion (no ATN, AIN, TMA, or glomerular injury attributable to the drug). The kidney-relevant practical issue is interpretive: the dominant laboratory abnormality is treatment-emergent creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation — grade 3/4 in 8/83 (10%) of vimseltinib patients in MOTION — together with peripheral/periorbital edema, either of which can perturb serum creatinine or muscle-derived markers without true GFR loss. Renal-specific events were not reported as a notable safety signal.Source: MOTION phase 3 (Gelderblom et al., Lancet 2024; PMID 38843860): the only grade 3/4 TEAE occurring in >5% of vimseltinib patients was increased blood CPK (10%); no clinically significant direct nephrotoxicity reported.

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injurySubacute (~1–6 weeks)

CPK elevations, edema, and any linked creatinine change emerge early, typically within the first 1-2 twenty-eight-day cycles (through ~day 56).

Distilled from: “CPK elevations and edema emerge early, typically within the first 1-2 treatment cycles (28-day cycles); any associated creatinine change tracks with these rather than following a delayed structural pattern.”

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Pseudo-AKI#1 · Signatureno population incidence denominator

    In the phase 3 MOTION trial (n=83) the predominant grade 3/4 laboratory abnormality was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10%); CSF1R inhibition characteristically produces asymptomatic creatinine/muscle-enzyme elevations (pseudo-AKI) rather than true GFR loss or structural injury. PMID 38843860 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

  2. Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKIRarequalitative — no citable incidence

    Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

CSF1R inhibition has no established intrinsic nephrotoxic mechanism — the tubular and glomerular epithelium are not primary CSF1R-dependent compartments, and there is no VEGF, calcineurin, platinum, or immune-checkpoint pathway engaged that would predict ATN, TMA, AIN, or podocytopathy. The relevant kidney consideration is indirect and largely artifactual: (1) marked CPK elevation (a class effect of CSF1R inhibition, reflecting altered macrophage handling of muscle CK rather than true rhabdomyolysis in most cases) can confound muscle/renal lab interpretation; (2) peripheral and periorbital edema with fluid shifts may transiently alter volume status and creatinine; and (3) any creatinine rise is best regarded as pseudo-AKI or hemodynamic/prerenal rather than structural until proven otherwise. Class read-across from pexidartinib (the other approved CSF1R inhibitor for TGCT) similarly shows hepatic — not renal — as the organ of concern (PMID 33197285).

Clinical presentation

Typically no renal manifestation. When laboratory abnormalities arise, expect asymptomatic CPK elevation (often the most prominent grade 3/4 lab finding) and peripheral/periorbital edema. A modest, often reversible serum creatinine fluctuation may accompany edema or volume shifts but is generally not associated with structural kidney injury, active urinary sediment, or proteinuria. Frank AKI, nephrotic-range proteinuria, hematuria, or electrolyte-wasting syndromes are not characteristic and should prompt a search for an alternative cause.

Management

For an isolated creatinine rise, assess volume status and reversible hemodynamic contributors first; correct volume depletion and hold/adjust concurrent diuretics or RAAS agents as appropriate. Check CPK and a urinalysis — bland sediment without proteinuria supports a pseudo-AKI/prerenal pattern rather than intrinsic injury. Manage CPK elevations and edema per the Romvimza label dose-modification scheme (dose interruption/reduction for significant or symptomatic elevations). Refer to nephrology and reconsider the diagnosis if there is true AKI, active sediment, new proteinuria, or features of TMA, none of which are expected from CSF1R inhibition. Avoid attributing structural kidney disease to the drug without supporting evidence.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • Baseline volume depletion or concurrent diuretics/RAAS blockade (amplifies any prerenal creatinine rise)
  • Pre-existing CKD limiting renal reserve
  • High baseline muscle mass or strenuous activity (confounds CPK interpretation)
  • Concomitant nephrotoxins or contrast that could unmask hemodynamic susceptibility
  • Significant peripheral edema with intravascular volume contraction

Prevention

  • Establish baseline serum creatinine, electrolytes, and CPK before starting
  • Do not reflexively discontinue for isolated asymptomatic CPK elevation — follow per-label monitoring and dose-modification guidance
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Vimseltinib is an oral, switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor designed to selectively and potently inhibit the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R). In tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), a translocation drives CSF1 overexpression, recruiting and sustaining CSF1R-bearing macrophage-lineage cells that form the tumor mass. By blocking CSF1R signaling, vimseltinib depletes this tumor-associated macrophage compartment, producing tumor regression and functional/symptomatic improvement. Its high kinase selectivity (sparing KIT, FLT3, and most class III/V RTKs) underlies a narrow off-target profile relative to less selective CSF1R/KIT inhibitors.

Note · Renal-specific literature for vimseltinib is essentially absent — no PubMed-indexed renal case reports or nephrotoxicity series as of mid-2026. The renal picture is drawn from the registrational MOTION phase 3 dataset and from CSF1R-inhibitor class behaviour (pexidartinib). Electrolyte disturbance is a minor monitoring consideration, not an established wasting syndrome, and no quantified direct-nephrotoxicity rate exists.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No dedicated renal dose-adjustment requirement is established for clinically meaningful direct nephrotoxicity, as the drug is not a recognized nephrotoxin. Vimseltinib is given orally 30 mg twice weekly in 28-day cycles. Formal pharmacokinetic data in moderate-to-severe renal impairment and in dialysis patients are limited; prescribe with standard caution in advanced CKD and consult the current label for any renal/hepatic dosing language, since hepatic handling and CYP interactions are the more pertinent PK considerations for this agent.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Not characterized. As a small-molecule kinase inhibitor that is highly protein-bound and predominantly hepatically metabolized, vimseltinib is unlikely to be meaningfully removed by hemodialysis, but no formal dialyzability data are available; do not assume dialysis clearance.

Differential diagnosis

A creatinine rise on vimseltinib should be worked up as pseudo-AKI/prerenal before structural injury is invoked. Distinguish from: (1) volume depletion/diuretic effect from edema management (prerenal — urine concentrated, bland sediment); (2) CPK-driven lab confounding versus true rhabdomyolysis-related AKI (check CPK trend, urine myoglobin); (3) unrelated intrinsic causes such as ATN from intercurrent illness, AIN from concomitant drugs (PPIs, antibiotics), or contrast exposure; and (4) for any TMA, proteinuria, or hypertension picture, look for an alternative agent (e.g., concurrent VEGF-pathway or platinum therapy), as these are not features of CSF1R inhibition.

Monitoring

  • CPK at baseline and during treatment (dominant lab signal; per-label monitoring)
  • Volume/edema assessment at each visit
  • Urinalysis if creatinine rises, to confirm bland sediment / exclude proteinuria or active sediment
  • LFTs per label (hepatic, not renal, is the principal organ of concern for the CSF1R class)

Key trials & series

  • MOTION (NCT05059262) — phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled; ORR 40% vs 0%; grade 3/4 CPK elevation in 10%, no significant direct nephrotoxicity (PMID 38843860)
  • MOTION protocol/design paper (PMID 37593881)
  • Pexidartinib long-term pooled analysis — class read-across showing hepatic, not renal, organ risk (PMID 33197285)

Clinical pearls

  • Vimseltinib is essentially a kidney-sparing targeted agent — there is no signature renal lesion; the practical onconephrology task is interpreting creatinine in the setting of CPK elevation and edema, not managing drug-induced AKI.
  • The headline lab abnormality is CPK elevation (grade 3/4 ~10% in MOTION), which is a CSF1R-class effect and usually asymptomatic — do not mistake it for rhabdomyolysis-driven AKI without supporting urine myoglobin/creatinine evidence.
  • For the CSF1R inhibitor class (vimseltinib, pexidartinib), the organ to watch is the liver, not the kidney — pexidartinib carries a hepatotoxicity boxed warning, while vimseltinib in MOTION showed no cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury.
Where it strikes· nephron segments & injury signatures

Nephron segments

Proximal Tubule

Bulk reabsorption + drug uptake (OCT2, OATs)

Vasculature / Endothelium

Glomerular & peritubular capillaries

§05

References

5 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

5 references · 2020–2025 · 4 since 2023
202020: 1 citation2023: 1 citation2024: 1 citation2025: 2 citations20202025

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.LandmarkVimseltinib versus placebo for tenosynovial giant cell tumour (MOTION): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.Gelderblom H, Bhadri V, Stacchiotti S, et al. · Lancet · 2024 · PMID 38843860Pivotal registrational phase 3 trial establishing efficacy and the full safety profile; documents CPK elevation as the dominant grade 3/4 lab abnormality (10%) and absence of a significant direct nephrotoxicity signal — the primary evidence base for the renal assessment.
  2. 2.The MOTION study: a randomized, phase III study of vimseltinib for the treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor.Tap WD, Sharma MG, Vallee M, et al. · Future Oncol · 2023 · PMID 37593881Trial rationale and design for MOTION, including mechanism (selective switch-control CSF1R inhibition), dosing (30 mg twice weekly), and endpoints; contextualizes the safety dataset.
  3. 3.Medical Management of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor.Palmerini E, Trent JC, Hornicek FJ. · Curr Oncol Rep · 2025 · PMID 40392406Current review of CSF1R-targeted systemic therapy for TGCT (vimseltinib, pexidartinib, others), framing class mechanism and the risk-benefit considerations relevant to organ safety.
  4. 4.Vimseltinib (Romvimza) for tenosynovial giant cell tumor.The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics. · Med Lett Drugs Ther · 2025 · PMID 40254734Independent post-approval drug review summarizing dosing, efficacy, adverse effects, and drug interactions for the approved product; supports the practical monitoring and dose-modification framing.
  5. 5.Long-term outcomes of pexidartinib in tenosynovial giant cell tumors.Gelderblom H, Wagner AJ, Tap WD, et al. · Cancer · 2020 · PMID 33197285Class read-across: the other approved CSF1R inhibitor for TGCT, demonstrating that the principal organ toxicity of CSF1R inhibition is hepatic rather than renal — supporting the conclusion that the kidney is largely spared by this drug class.

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 532 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 1 signal

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-10-01.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Pseudo-AKINot queried in FAERS — No MedDRA term set is defined for this phenotype, so FAERS was never asked about it.
  • Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKINot queried in FAERS — No MedDRA term set is defined for this phenotype, so FAERS was never asked about it.
Hypertension
ROR 3.4295% CI 2.39–4.89· 32 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 0.2% of reports w/ death · 3.6% w/ hospitalization
0.2%

Reported with a death outcome

1 of 532 reports

3.6%

Reported with hospitalization

19 of 532 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 0 reports
  • 2016: 0 reports
  • 2017: 0 reports
  • 2018: 0 reports
  • 2019: 0 reports
  • 2020: 0 reports
  • 2021: 2 reports
  • 2022: 1 reports
  • 2023: 0 reports
  • 2024: 0 reports
  • 2025: 313 reports
  • 2026: 216 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 9 systems · 532 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-10-01.

General / constitutional
Fatigue133Peripheral Swelling50Asthenia27Pain27Periorbital Oedema23
Skin
Pruritus63Rash42
Musculoskeletal
Arthralgia42Joint Swelling14Pain In Extremity13
Gastrointestinal
Nausea41Diarrhoea17
Hepatobiliary
Hepatic Enzyme Increased32Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased22
Nervous system
Headache39Somnolence13
Eye
Eye Swelling40
Vascular
Hypertension18Blood Pressure Increased14
Immune / infection
Nasopharyngitis14
Guidelines & consensus· 13

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknownsKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38519239Evaluate and risk-stratify CKD, manage to delay progression and its complications, and practise explicit medication management and drug stewardship — the framework the atlas's G1–G5 eGFR banding and every renal dose-adjustment recommendation sit inside. Because the guideline excludes dialysis and transplant recipients by its own statement of scope, its recommendations do not carry to those settings, where this atlas's dialyzability and post-transplant guidance rests on other sources.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Vimseltinib sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Momelotinib

Ojjaara · JAK/ACVR1 inhibitor

Profile

2023 myelofibrosis JAK inhibitor.

PSEUDOPRE
Mild#1 · 100% phenotype match

Alectinib

Alecensa · ALK TKI

Profile

Creatinine rise via reduced tubular secretion.

PSEUDOPRE
Mild#2 · 86% phenotype match

Bosutinib

Bosulif · BCR-ABL TKI

Profile

Reversible eGFR decline.

PSEUDOPRE
Mild#3 · 86% phenotype match

Ceritinib

Zykadia · ALK TKI

Profile

GI-driven prerenal AKI.

PREPSEUDO
Mild#4 · 86% phenotype match

Pralsetinib

Gavreto · RET inhibitor

Profile

Hypertension; rare AKI.

HTNPREPSEUDO
Mild#5 · 81% phenotype match

Imlunestrant

Inluriyo · Oral selective estrogen-receptor degrader (SERD)

Profile

2025 brain-penetrant oral SERD; renally benign — the only wrinkle is the benign abemaciclib creatinine rise in the combo.

PSEUDOPRE
Mild#6 · 78% phenotype match
Compare Vimseltinib with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across Other kinase inhibitors

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1PexidartinibMild
  2. 2RipretinibMild
  3. 3AvapritinibMild
  4. 4FedratinibMild
  5. 5MidostaurinMild
  6. 6QuizartinibMild
  7. 7Vimseltinib· this agentMild
  8. 8PralsetinibMild
  9. 9RuxolitinibMild
  10. 10MomelotinibFAERS AKIMild
  11. 11GilteritinibModerate
  12. 12PacritinibModerate
  13. 13SelpercatinibModerate

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.