Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

PROTAC estrogen-receptor degrader

Vepdegestrant

Veppanu · VPD

PROTAC estrogen-receptor degrader · approved 2026 · 2 citations

Up to date· through 2025
Limited evidence3/9 · 4 signals
  • 2 citations
  • Deep literature (12+ refs)
  • Accrued over 3+ years
  • Beyond single case reports
  • High-impact journal
  • Landmark reference
  • Registrational / key trials
  • Current through 2025
  • Real-world FAERS signal

Grades the strength of the evidence base (volume, journal quality, landmark trials, recency, real-world corroboration) — not the drug's severity. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

An oral PROTAC that drags the estrogen receptor to the proteasome for destruction — an elegant mechanism with, for the kidney, a reassuringly quiet story: no meaningful nephrotoxicity.

MildPROTAC estrogen-receptor degrader
ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, particularly with ESR1 mutations, after prior CDK4/6-inhibitor and endocrine therapyThe first PROTAC degrader to reach registrational breast-cancer use
§01

Signature kidney injury

Vepdegestrant carries no meaningful renal signal and no discrete published incidence of drug-related acute kidney injury. In the phase 3 VERITAC-2 trial (Campone, N Engl J Med 2025; n=624) grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 23.4% of patients — modestly above fulvestrant (17.6%) — and only 2.9% discontinued for adverse events, with a profile dominated by hematologic and constitutional effects rather than a nephrotoxic one. Any renal contribution would be indirect (for example, prerenal physiology if a patient became volume-depleted from an intercurrent illness), not an intrinsic kidney toxicity of the drug.Source: No meaningful renal signal; grade 3+ AEs 23.4% with 2.9% discontinuation in VERITAC-2 (Campone 2025), profile not nephrotoxic

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's defining kidney lesion — its #1 signature. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Renal hypoperfusion from capillary leak and cytokine storm — IL-2 and CAR-T cytokine release syndrome.

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

Vepdegestrant has no established direct renal toxicity. It acts by hijacking the ubiquitin-proteasome system to degrade tumor ER and is metabolized rather than renally eliminated; the kidney is neither a target of injury nor the clearance route. As with other endocrine agents, the only route to kidney trouble is indirect and non-specific — volume depletion from intercurrent GI illness or reduced intake producing prerenal azotemia — rather than any tubular, interstitial, or glomerular lesion attributable to the drug. The novel PROTAC mechanism does not introduce a known nephron-specific liability.

Clinical presentation

No characteristic renal presentation; renal function is expected to remain stable on therapy. Should a creatinine rise occur, it is typically explained by an intercurrent prerenal insult (poor intake, vomiting/diarrhea, other drugs) rather than by vepdegestrant, and it corrects with the usual supportive measures.

Management

No vepdegestrant-specific renal management is required. If a prerenal creatinine rise occurs from volume depletion, restore volume and address the precipitant; investigate a progressive rise, proteinuria, or an active sediment as a separate renal process. There is no role for dialysis or drug-specific renal rescue in relation to this agent.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • Intercurrent volume depletion (vomiting, diarrhea, poor intake) causing prerenal physiology
  • Baseline CKD (lowers reserve for any intercurrent insult)
  • Concurrent nephrotoxins or true renal insults unrelated to the drug

Prevention

  • Maintain hydration during intercurrent GI illness
  • Review co-medications for nephrotoxins if renal function changes
  • Routine chemistry monitoring as part of standard oncologic care
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Oral proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) estrogen-receptor degrader: a bifunctional molecule that simultaneously binds estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and an E3 ubiquitin ligase, tagging the receptor with ubiquitin so the cell's own ubiquitin-proteasome system destroys it. This catalytic degradation achieves deep, sustained ER knockdown, including in ESR1-mutant tumors, and is given orally once daily in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No renal-impairment dose adjustment is established; vepdegestrant is an oral, metabolically cleared PROTAC and VERITAC-2 required adequate organ function. GFR is not the determinant of exposure, and dose modification is based on tolerability (hematologic, constitutional) rather than kidney function.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Not characterized as dialyzable and not clinically relevant: as a large, protein-bound, metabolically cleared molecule, vepdegestrant is not expected to be removed by hemodialysis, and no renal-elimination or drug-removal scenario makes dialysis relevant for this agent.

Differential diagnosis

Any renal abnormality in a patient on vepdegestrant should be attributed to a cause other than the drug: prerenal volume depletion from intercurrent illness, a concurrent nephrotoxin, contrast, obstruction, or disease progression. Vepdegestrant is not a tubular, interstitial, or glomerular toxin, so a true renal lesion warrants an independent workup rather than reflexive attribution to the endocrine agent.

Monitoring

  • Routine serum creatinine as part of standard care (no drug-specific renal surveillance required)
  • Volume status during intercurrent GI illness
  • Standard tolerability monitoring (blood counts, constitutional symptoms) that drives dose changes

Key trials & series

  • VERITAC-2 (Campone, N Engl J Med 2025) — phase 3 trial of vepdegestrant versus fulvestrant in ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (n=624); vepdegestrant improved progression-free survival in the ESR1-mutant subgroup with grade 3+ adverse events of 23.4% and a 2.9% discontinuation rate — a tolerability profile without a nephrotoxic signal.

Clinical pearls

  • First-of-its-kind mechanism, unremarkable kidney story: vepdegestrant degrades the ER via the proteasome and leaves the nephron alone.
  • A creatinine rise on vepdegestrant is almost always something else — look for volume depletion or another nephrotoxin.
  • Its dose is modified for blood counts and tolerability, not for GFR.
  • There is no dialysis or renal-rescue scenario tied to this drug.
  • A grounded 'kidney-safe' answer is the useful takeaway when a patient on vepdegestrant is being risk-assessed.
Where it strikes· nephron segments & injury signatures

Nephron segments

Vasculature / Endothelium

Glomerular & peritubular capillaries

Guidelines & consensus· 12

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Vepdegestrant sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype.

Vepdegestrant
Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class — open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· nearest neighbors in nephrotoxicity space

Imlunestrant

Inluriyo · Oral selective estrogen-receptor degrader (SERD)

Profile

2025 brain-penetrant oral SERD; renally benign — the only wrinkle is the benign abemaciclib creatinine rise in the combo.

PRE
Mild100% phenotype match

Elacestrant

Orserdu · Oral selective estrogen-receptor degrader (SERD)

Profile

2023 oral SERD; nausea-dominant, minimal intrinsic nephrotoxicity.

PRE
Mild100% phenotype match

Dordaviprone

Modeyso · Imipridone (ONC201; DRD2/ClpP)

Profile

2025 imipridone for H3 K27M glioma; renally well tolerated — QT prolongation, not nephrotoxicity, is the safety focus.

PRE
Mild89% phenotype match

Tisotumab vedotin

Tivdak · Antibody-drug conjugate (tissue factor/MMAE)

Profile

Ocular/bleeding toxicity dominates; renal involvement essentially unreported.

PRE
Mild89% phenotype match

Pexidartinib

Turalio · CSF1R inhibitor

Profile

Boxed hepatotoxicity; secondary renal effects.

PRE
Mild88% phenotype match

Radium-223 dichloride

Xofigo · Radiopharmaceutical (alpha-emitter)

Profile

Bone-seeking alpha emitter; minimal direct renal toxicity.

PRE
Mild88% phenotype match

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.