Skip to content
Back to explorer
Printable monograph

mTOR inhibitor

Temsirolimus

Torisel · TEM

mTOR inhibitor · approved 2007 · 10 citations

Dated evidence· through 2016
Fairly sourced4/9 · 4 signals
  • Met: 10 citations
  • Not met: 12+ references
  • Not met: Accrued over 10+ years (span: 9y)
  • Met: Beyond single case reports
  • Met: High-impact journal
  • Met: Landmark reference
  • Not met: Current through 2016
  • Not met: Real-world FAERS signal

Describes how this page is sourced, not how dangerous the drug is. Thinly sourced means fewer of the sourcing signals are met — not that the agent is kidney-safe. A rule-based summary, not a formal certainty appraisal.

The IV rapalog whose kidney signal is podocyte proteinuria — real for the class, thinly quantified for the drug.

MildmTOR inhibitor
Advanced (poor-prognosis) renal cell carcinomaRelapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (EU approval)
§01

Signature kidney injury

Representative grade ≥3 incidence5%

Not firmly quantified for temsirolimus specifically. Proteinuria is the recognized mTOR-inhibitor glomerular signal, but for temsirolimus it is documented mostly at the class/case level rather than in drug-specific renal endpoints (everolimus proteinuria runs high yet is usually grade 1-2 — e.g., 96% all-grade in one first-line mRCC cohort). In the pivotal temsirolimus ARCC trial, metabolic lab abnormalities (hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypophosphatemia) dominated and frank nephrotoxicity was uncommon; drug-specific AKI and nephrotic syndrome appear only in case reports. Reported rate: grade >=3 hypophosphatemia in 5% — 82 East Asian (Sun 2012, PMID 22844126).Source: Sun et al., Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012 (grade >=3 hypophosphatemia; drug-specific proteinuria/AKI still not separately quantified — class/case context from Land et al., J Oncol Pharm Pract 2014 and Heras et al., Nefrologia 2009)

Onset & rechallenge

Time to injurySubacute (~1–6 weeks)

Typically weeks to months into weekly dosing; not firmly characterized for temsirolimus.

Distilled from: Subacute — typically weeks to months into weekly dosing; not firmly characterized for temsirolimus. · PMID 17538086 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

§02

Renal toxicities, ranked

This agent's kidney lesions ordered by prominence — the #1 signature lesion first, then secondary and rare patterns. Cited incidence is shown where a citable figure exists; otherwise the tier stands qualitatively.

  1. Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria#1 · Signaturequalitative — no citable incidence

    Damage to the filtration barrier — podocyte injury, FSGS and protein leak from VEGF and mTOR blockade.

  2. Electrolyte DisturbanceSecondaryqualitative — no citable incidence

    Renal electrolyte derangement — magnesium/potassium/calcium wasting (cisplatin, anti-EGFR antibodies) or retention (FGFR-inhibitor hyperphosphatemia, tumor-lysis hyperkalemia/hyperphosphatemia).

Toxicity fingerprint

Tap a signature to trace where it strikes the nephron.

5%grade ≥3 incidence
SeverityMild
ReversibilityVariable
Evidence10 citations
Nephron map
GlomerulusFiltration barrier (podocytes + endothelium)
Proximal Tubule
Distal Tubule / Collecting Duct

Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria

Damage to the filtration barrier — podocyte injury, FSGS and protein leak from VEGF and mTOR blockade.

§03

Kidney injury

Mechanism of kidney injury

Inferred largely from the sirolimus/everolimus class (temsirolimus is a sirolimus prodrug): mTORC1 (and secondary mTORC2) inhibition in podocytes down-regulates slit-diaphragm proteins (nephrin, TRPC6) and the Nck/actin cytoskeleton, and disrupts the autophagic flux podocytes depend on for maintenance and repair — producing proteinuria and FSGS-type lesions. Reduced VEGF signaling with an antiproliferative effect on glomerular endothelium can add a thrombotic-microangiopathy-like component. Proximal-tubular phosphate wasting contributes to the class-typical hypophosphatemia.

Clinical presentation

Usually asymptomatic proteinuria found on urinalysis or urine protein/creatinine ratio, occasionally nephrotic-range with edema; sometimes a modest creatinine rise. Rare acute kidney injury is reported at case level. Hypophosphatemia (and less often hypokalemia) plus the metabolic derangements hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia are common lab findings, distinct from primary renal parenchymal injury.

Management

Quantify proteinuria with a UPCR/UACR. Low-grade proteinuria can usually be continued with monitoring; add an ACEi or ARB for its antiproteinuric effect. Reduce dose or hold for grade 3-4 or nephrotic-range proteinuria or a rising creatinine, and discontinue for persistent nephrotic syndrome or progressive decline. Refer to nephrology and consider biopsy for nephrotic-range proteinuria or atypical AKI. Replace phosphate and manage hyperglycemia/hyperlipidemia. For rare AKI, hold the drug and correct prerenal/GI-loss contributors with supportive care.Lesion-level management framework

Risk factors

  • Pre-existing CKD or baseline proteinuria
  • Reduced renal mass (post-nephrectomy / solitary kidney in RCC)
  • Diabetes or hypertension
  • Prior or concurrent VEGF-pathway-targeted therapy
  • Hypoalbuminemia

Prevention

  • Optimize blood pressure and avoid concurrent nephrotoxins
Anticancer mechanism· how it treats cancer

Temsirolimus is an IV ester prodrug of sirolimus (rapamycin). It binds FKBP-12, and the complex inhibits mTORC1, lowering HIF-1alpha/VEGF and cyclin D1 to arrest tumor cells in G1 and blunt angiogenesis.

Note · IV ester prodrug of sirolimus; renal profile largely extrapolated from the sirolimus/everolimus class. Temsirolimus-specific renal incidence is not firmly quantified — claims are hedged to case-level and class evidence.
§04

Clinical depth

Renal dose adjustment

No specific renal dose adjustment is recommended in the label — temsirolimus and its active metabolite sirolimus are cleared by hepatic CYP3A4 metabolism and biliary excretion, not renal elimination, so renal impairment does not mandate a dose change (efficacy/safety in severe renal impairment are not established; use caution). Hepatic impairment, not renal, drives dose reduction (and severe hepatic impairment is a contraindication). Standard RCC dosing is 25 mg IV weekly.

Dialyzability & ESKD dosing

Not meaningfully dialyzable. Sirolimus (the active moiety) has a large volume of distribution, extensive tissue and erythrocyte partitioning, and high protein/lipoprotein binding, so hemodialysis is not expected to remove clinically significant amounts; direct data are limited.

Differential diagnosis

Separate drug-induced podocytopathy/proteinuria from RCC-associated paraneoplastic glomerulopathy (membranous nephropathy, minimal-change disease), diabetic nephropathy, and hypertensive nephrosclerosis. In sequenced RCC regimens, concurrent or prior VEGF-pathway inhibitors can cause overlapping proteinuria/TMA. For an acute creatinine rise, weigh prerenal azotemia from GI losses/dehydration and ischemic/contrast ATN. Hypophosphatemia has its own differential (poor intake, other tubular toxins).

Monitoring

  • Baseline and periodic urinalysis / UPCR or UACR for proteinuria
  • Serum creatinine and eGFR
  • Serum phosphate and potassium
  • Fasting glucose and lipid panel (metabolic class effects)
  • Blood pressure

Key trials & series

  • GLOBAL ARCC (Hudes et al., NEJM 2007) — pivotal phase 3 in poor-prognosis metastatic RCC establishing 25 mg IV weekly; hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hypophosphatemia were prominent while frank nephrotoxicity was uncommon and renal-specific proteinuria was not systematically captured
  • Phase 3 mantle-cell-lymphoma program — higher 175/75 mg dosing with a different, mostly hematologic/GI safety profile (Bouabdallah et al., Curr Opin Oncol 2013)

Clinical pearls

  • Temsirolimus is the IV ester prodrug of sirolimus — its renal footprint is inferred mainly from the sirolimus/everolimus class literature rather than temsirolimus-specific trials.
  • Proteinuria (podocyte slit-diaphragm down-regulation plus autophagy disruption, with FSGS in some cases) is the signature mTOR-inhibitor renal signal, but the temsirolimus-specific incidence is not firmly quantified — hedge.
  • The pivotal ARCC trial foregrounded hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hypophosphatemia; frank nephrotoxicity was uncommon and creatinine changes modest.
  • An ACEi/ARB plus dose reduction usually controls proteinuria; nephrotic-range proteinuria or a rising creatinine warrants holding the drug and nephrology input.
  • Watch for additive glomerular injury when temsirolimus is sequenced with VEGF-pathway agents in RCC.
Beyond the kidney — non-renal toxicities· 4 organ systems

Class-level context for the major non-renal toxicities of mtor inhibitors.

Pulmonary

Pneumonitis, ILD, effusions, hypertension

  • Non-infectious pneumonitis

Endocrine

Thyroiditis, hypophysitis, diabetes

  • Hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia

Gastrointestinal

Diarrhea, colitis, mucositis, perforation

  • Stomatitis

Immune / Infusion

CRS, infusion reactions, irAEs, anaphylaxis

  • Immunosuppression / infection
§05

References

9 primary references — trials, cohorts, mechanism, and reviews. Single-patient case reports are listed separately below, graded by strength. Citation metadata via PubMed / NLM.

Evidence accrual

9 references · 20072016 · 2 since 2014
202007: 1 citation2008: 2 citations2009: 1 citation2011: 1 citation2012: 1 citation2013: 1 citation2014: 1 citation2016: 1 citation200720102016

Primary (non–case-report) references per year — a proxy for how actively the agent's renal literature is accruing. Recent years are highlighted. Reflects curation depth, not a systematic bibliometric count.

  1. 1.LandmarkTemsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.Hudes G et al. · N Engl J Med · 2007 · PMID 17538086Pivotal phase 3 (Global ARCC) registrational trial in poor-prognosis metastatic RCC; metabolic lab abnormalities (hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypophosphatemia) prominent while frank nephrotoxicity was uncommon.
  2. 2.LandmarkInhibition of MTOR disrupts autophagic flux in podocytes.Cinà DP et al. · J Am Soc Nephrol · 2011 · PMID 22193387Podocyte-selective mTOR loss and rapamycin disrupt autophagic flux, causing proteinuria — core mechanism of mTOR-inhibitor glomerular injury.
  3. 3.LandmarkmTOR regulates expression of slit diaphragm proteins and cytoskeleton structure in podocytes.Vollenbröker B et al. · Am J Physiol Renal Physiol · 2008 · PMID 19019920Molecular basis of mTOR-inhibitor proteinuria/FSGS — rapamycin down-regulates nephrin/TRPC6 and the podocyte cytoskeleton.
  4. 4.mToR inhibitors-induced proteinuria: mechanisms, significance, and management.Letavernier E et al. · Transplant Rev (Orlando) · 2008 · PMID 18631865Review linking mTOR inhibition to podocyte injury/FSGS and framing significance and management of the class proteinuria.
  5. 5.Proteinuria with first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell cancer.Land JD et al. · J Oncol Pharm Pract · 2016 · PMID 25505255Class incidence context in mRCC — high all-grade but mostly grade 1-2 proteinuria (everolimus 96%), supporting continued monitoring for low-grade events.
  6. 6.Strategies for the management of adverse events associated with mTOR inhibitors.Kaplan B et al. · Transplant Rev (Orlando) · 2014 · PMID 24685370Practical incidence and management guidance for mTOR-inhibitor proteinuria and nephrotoxicity across oncology and transplant use.
  7. 7.[Acute renal failure in a patient with renal carcinoma treated with temsirolimus].Heras M et al. · Nefrologia · 2009 · PMID 19936012Temsirolimus-specific case of acute renal failure in RCC — the drug-level (case) evidence behind the AKI signal.
  8. 8.Temsirolimus in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma: frequency and management of adverse effects.Bouabdallah K et al. · Curr Opin Oncol · 2013 · PMID 23388840Temsirolimus-specific adverse-event frequency and management, including the higher 175/75 mg MCL dosing and its distinct safety profile.
  9. 9.Phase II study of the safety and efficacy of temsirolimus in East Asian patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.Sun Y et al. · Jpn J Clin Oncol · 2012 · PMID 22844126Source of the stored incidence: the most frequent Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were anemia, hyperglycemia, hypophosphatemia and stomatitis (5% each) among 82 East Asian patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Case reports — ranked by strength· 1

Single-patient and small-series reports, graded by evidentiary strength — A Strong (biopsy-proven plus a series and/or positive rechallenge), B Moderate, and C Limited (a single clinically-diagnosed case). Strongest first. Grades are inferred automatically from each report's abstract and journal — a heuristic ranking aid, not a formal quality appraisal.

FDA label — boxed warning & renal dosing· renal impairment

Quoted verbatim from this agent's current FDA label (Dec 2025) — not paraphrased or interpreted. Full label on DailyMed .

Renal impairment — from the label

No clinical studies were conducted with TORISEL in patients with decreased renal function. Less than 5% of total radioactivity was excreted in the urine following a 25 mg intravenous dose of [ 14 C]-labeled temsirolimus in healthy subjects. Renal impairment is not expected to markedly influence drug exposure, and no dosage adjustment of TORISEL is recommended in patients with renal impairment. TORISEL has not been studied in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

What gets reported — FAERS

Everything below is FAERS — adverse events someone chose to report, about 4,502 of them for this agent. Nobody counts the patients who were fine, so none of these numbers is an incidence, a risk, or a rate: they describe what gets reported, shaped by a drug's fame, its indication, and who was watching. How these numbers work.

  • Reporting odds ratio (ROR) — is kidney injury named in this agent's reports more often than in every other drug's? Above 1 means yes, disproportionately.
  • Renal phenotypes — the same question asked separately for each kind of kidney injury, so the ratios differ from the overall one and from each other.
  • Outcomes — a share of this agent's own reports, not of patients: how many were filed as involving a death or a hospitalization. Not a case-fatality rate.
FAERS reported renal phenotypes· 7 signals

Only significant signals appear (95% CI lower bound above 1) — a phenotype missing here was tested and did not reach significance, except Prerenal / Hemodynamic AKI, Pseudo-AKI, Renal Cysts, Chronic Interstitial Nephropathy — outside the clinician-reviewed MedDRA term map, never queried — and ATN and AIN, queried but biopsy-bound: real cases are filed as generic “acute kidney injury”, so their absence is not a negative. As of 2026-08-21.

What reporting says about this profile's documented lesions

  • Glomerular Injury / Proteinuriacorroborated · ROR 7.6 — on the terms that name the lesion (ROR 2.36)
  • Electrolyte Disturbancecorroborated · ROR 5.25 — on the terms that name the lesion (ROR 4.04)
Glomerular Injury / Proteinuria
ROR 7.6095% CI 5.7010.14· 47 reports
Electrolyte Disturbance
ROR 5.2595% CI 4.566.03· 207 reports
SIADH / Hyponatremia
ROR 3.6295% CI 2.824.66· 62 reports
Acute Tubular Necrosis
ROR 2.8595% CI 1.286.34· 6 reports
Thrombotic Microangiopathy
ROR 2.1195% CI 1.004.42· 7 reports
Hemorrhagic Cystitis
ROR 1.8995% CI 1.302.74· 28 reports
Hypertension
ROR 1.6395% CI 1.371.93· 133 reports
FAERS outcomes & reporting trend· 21.5% of reports w/ death · 44.5% w/ hospitalization
21.5%

Reported with a death outcome

967 of 4,502 reports

44.5%

Reported with hospitalization

2,002 of 4,502 reports

Reports per year

  • 2015: 328 reports
  • 2016: 247 reports
  • 2017: 153 reports
  • 2018: 132 reports
  • 2019: 119 reports
  • 2020: 106 reports
  • 2021: 79 reports
  • 2022: 138 reports
  • 2023: 60 reports
  • 2024: 44 reports
  • 2025: 16 reports
  • 2026: 5 reports

Yearly FAERS report volume · most recent year is partial.

FAERS adverse-event signal — all organ systems· 9 systems · 4,502 reports

Bars rank systems by summed reaction-term mentions (a report counts once per term it names) — an ordinal “more vs less reported” cue, not a tally of distinct reports. Renal & urinary first. As of 2026-08-08.

Disproportionality (acute kidney injury):ROR 0.9895% CI 0.691.39· 32 AKI reports ·no disproportionate AKI reporting signal (CI spans 1).
Renal & urinary
Blood Creatinine Increased102Renal Failure96
Gastrointestinal
Nausea190Diarrhoea189Vomiting177Stomatitis156Mucosal Inflammation112
Blood & lymphatic
Anaemia188Thrombocytopenia164Febrile Neutropenia126Neutropenia106
Respiratory
Dyspnoea215Pleural Effusion125Interstitial Lung Disease111Pneumonitis108
General / constitutional
Fatigue206Pyrexia179Asthenia124
Metabolic & electrolyte
Dehydration162Decreased Appetite113
Immune / infection
Pneumonia190
Skin
Rash143
Vascular
Hypertension100
Guidelines & consensus· 12

Each recommendation below is this atlas's faithful summary of the source, not a quotation from it — follow the PubMed link for the wording the society published. Summaries may be superseded; consult the current full text and individualize to the patient.

General onco-nephrology references

ADQIThe nephrotoxic effects of anti-cancer therapies: consensus report of the 34th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroupNat Rev Nephrol 2026 · PMID 41361704Provides expert-based statements (modified Delphi) on preventing and managing cisplatin/platinum-associated AKI, including isotonic IV hydration, attention to volume status and concomitant nephrotoxins, and incorporates evidence that IV magnesium supplementation may reduce cisplatin-associated AKI; emphasizes risk stratification and standardized AKI definitions.SIRMSIRM-SIN-AIOM: appropriateness criteria for evaluation and prevention of renal damage in the patient undergoing contrast medium examinations-consensus statements from Italian College of Radiology (SIRM), Italian College of Nephrology (SIN) and Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)Radiol Med 2022 · PMID 35303246Recommends eGFR-based renal risk assessment and pre/post-contrast isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate hydration; advises maintaining a 5-7 day interval between iodinated contrast administration and cisplatin in cancer patients to reduce additive nephrotoxicity.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: understanding kidney impairment and solid-organ malignancies, and managing kidney cancerKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33126977Identifies platinum compounds (especially cisplatin) as leading cytotoxic causes of acute tubular injury, AKI, and electrolyte/magnesium wasting; calls for interdisciplinary onco-nephrology care, accurate GFR estimation, and individualized drug dosing in patients with reduced kidney function.KDIGOKDIGO Controversies Conference on onco-nephrology: kidney disease in hematological malignancies and the burden of cancer after kidney transplantationKidney Int 2020 · PMID 33276867Addresses chemotherapy-associated AKI/CKD in hematologic cancer, GFR estimation and chemotherapy dosing in patients with reduced kidney function, and management priorities and research gaps for onco-nephrology care.ADDIKDIntegrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practiceEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290844Provides GRADE-based, drug-specific dose-adjustment recommendations for anticancer agents in kidney dysfunction (illustrated for methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab); the recommendations build on Part 1's standardised CKD-EPI eGFR assessment rather than Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance.ADDIKDAligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicineEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290845Three consensus recommendations: assess kidney function by GFR (measured GFR or CKD-EPI eGFR), classify it using KDIGO categories, and use this uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs — moving cancer medicine away from Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance.ADDIKDA methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney functionEClinicalMedicine 2025 · PMID 40290846Establishes that, where RCT evidence is lacking, anticancer drug dosing recommendations in kidney dysfunction should be derived by critically appraising observational literature via GRADE combined with structured international multidisciplinary consensus voting.KDIGODiagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)Crit Care 2013 · PMID 23394211Defines/stages AKI by serum creatinine and urine output; emphasizes avoiding nephrotoxins, maintaining euvolemia/perfusion, dose-adjusting drugs to kidney function, and monitoring high-risk patients — the framework applied to nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular DiseasesKidney Int 2021 · PMID 34556300Provides the staging/treatment framework for drug-associated glomerular lesions (e.g., bisphosphonate- and interferon-related collapsing FSGS, VEGF-inhibitor podocytopathy/proteinuria), including immunosuppression and supportive RAAS-blockade strategies.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated VasculitisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38388147Updates immunosuppressive induction (rituximab/cyclophosphamide), incorporates avacopan and lower-dose or glucocorticoid-sparing regimens — the management framework for drug- and checkpoint-inhibitor-associated ANCA/pauci-immune glomerulonephritis.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus NephritisKidney Int 2024 · PMID 38182299Updates first-line lupus nephritis therapy to combination immunosuppression with the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin) — informs management of immune-complex/lupus-like glomerulonephritis encountered with immunotherapy.KDIGOExecutive summary of the KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN) and Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis (IgAV)Kidney Int 2025 · PMID 40975525Encourages liberal kidney biopsy and stricter proteinuria control (<0.5 g/d, ideally <0.3 g/d) with RAAS blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, and targeted-release budesonide — the framework for IgA-dominant glomerular lesions, including those triggered by immune-modulating cancer therapy.

Where Temsirolimus sits in nephrotoxicity space — each dot is an anti-cancer agent, positioned so neighbors share a kidney-injury phenotype. Its 6 closest are filled and lead to a numbered marker, matching the numbered cards below.

Position is a 2-D projection (MDS) of each agent's injury signature, nephron target, severity, and class, so two dots can sit close on the page while differing on an axis the projection flattened — the numbered ranking is computed from the full metric, not from the distance you see. Open the full map.
Phenotype-similar agents· the numbered markers on the map above

Everolimus

Afinitor · mTOR inhibitor

Profile

Podocyte injury with proteinuria/FSGS; occasional thrombotic microangiopathy.

GLOMTMALYTE
Moderate#1 · 71% phenotype match

Cetuximab

Erbitux · Anti-EGFR antibody

Profile

TRPM6 magnesium wasting.

LYTEGLOM
Mild#2 · 64% phenotype match

Panitumumab

Vectibix · Anti-EGFR antibody

Profile

TRPM6 magnesium wasting — heavier than cetuximab.

LYTEGLOM
Mild#3 · 64% phenotype match

mTOR inhibitors (everolimus · temsirolimus)

mTOR inhibitor

Profile

Podocyte injury → proteinuria and FSGS.

GLOMATNTMA
Mild#4 · 62% phenotype match

Sirolimus

Rapamune · mTOR inhibitor

Profile

Proteinuria, cast nephropathy, delayed graft recovery.

GLOMATN
Moderate#5 · 61% phenotype match

Ibandronate

Boniva · Bisphosphonate

Profile

Lower renal risk than zoledronate.

ATNLYTEGLOM
Mild#6 · 60% phenotype match
Compare Temsirolimus with its nearest agents

Nearest agents by kidney-injury phenotype (shared injuries, nephron target, severity, class) — a similarity approximation, not a claim of shared drug identity or mechanism.

Kidney risk across mTOR inhibitors

Same-class agents ordered by their documented kidney-injury profile — atlas severity, an acute-kidney-injury FAERS signal, and how many injury types each is documented to cause. Agents nearer the top carry the lighter documented renal profile.

  1. 1Temsirolimus· this agentMild
  2. 2mTOR inhibitors (everolimus · temsirolimus)Mild
  3. 3SirolimusFAERS AKIModerate
  4. 4EverolimusFAERS AKIModerate

A comparison of documented kidney-injury data within one drug class — not a substitution recommendation. Efficacy, indication, and non-renal toxicity differ between these agents and are out of scope here. Educational only, not medical advice.

Who studies this

The leading contributors to Temsirolimus’s clinical kidney literature on PubMed, ranked by a blend of publication volume and citation impact — filtered toward clinical work via the PubMed Humans heading and clinical publication types (trials, cohorts, case reports, guidelines, reviews). Names link to that author’s work on Temsirolimus.

  1. Puzanov, Igor — their work on Temsirolimus, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)2 papers · 50 citesPMID 27036973 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 19402058 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
  2. Erlichman, Charles — their work on Temsirolimus, on PubMed (opens in a new tab)2 papers · 21 citesPMID 35041344 (opens PubMed in a new tab)PMID 25556030 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Ranked by publication volume and citation impact (NIH iCite) on this agent’s renal literature — bibliometric context, not an endorsement or a measure of clinical authority.