Skip to content

Landmark evidence

The numbers that defined onco-nephrology

The seminal studies of anti-cancer-drug kidney injury, each reduced to the single figure that made it matter — the incidence that named a syndrome, the effect size that proved a link, the trial that set a standard of care. Every number is quoted from a real PubMed record and was checked against that paper's own abstract; none is invented or estimated.

42 studies across 12 fields. Educational reference, not medical advice — see methods for how the atlas sources its citations.

Showing 42 of 42 landmark studies.

Anti-VEGF & TKI

Deep dive →

The podocyte-VEGF axis: proteinuria, hypertension, and thrombotic microangiopathy.

Mechanism2003
50% VEGF loss

Podocyte-specific VEGF-A heterozygosity (~50% loss) caused proteinuria + glomerular endotheliosis by 2.5 weeks of age

The founding mechanistic paper of the field. Years before anti-VEGF drug nephrotoxicity was recognized, it showed that glomerular VEGF is dose-critical for the filtration barrier, predicting why pharmacologic VEGF blockade would injure the podocyte-endothelial axis and cause proteinuria/endotheliosis.

Eremina V, et al.
J Clin Invest · VEGF-A (genetic model)
PMID 12618525 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Mechanism2008
On-target TMA

Deleting VEGF from mouse podocytes reproduced 'a profound thrombotic glomerular injury' matching 6 bevacizumab-treated patients

The paper that named 'VEGF inhibition and renal thrombotic microangiopathy,' establishing anti-VEGF kidney injury as a direct, on-target podocyte-VEGF effect. It is the mechanistic bedrock the entire anti-VEGF nephrotoxicity literature builds on.

Eremina V, et al.
N Engl J Med · Bevacizumab
PMID 18337603 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2010
RR 4.79

Relative risk 4.79 (95% CI 2.71 to 8.46) for high-grade proteinuria; nephrotic syndrome RR 7.78 (95% CI 1.80 to 33.62)

The definitive quantification of bevacizumab proteinuria risk — the reference meta-analysis clinicians cite for the magnitude of severe proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome on anti-VEGF therapy, and evidence of dose- and tumor-dependence.

Wu S, et al.
J Am Soc Nephrol · Bevacizumab
PMID 20538785 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2010
RR 5.28

High-grade hypertension RR 5.28 (95% CI 4.15-6.71); all-grade hypertension incidence 23.6% (95% CI 20.5-27.1)

The large-scale reference meta-analysis for bevacizumab-induced hypertension — the numbers routinely quoted for both the incidence and the magnitude of anti-VEGF hypertension, cementing blood-pressure monitoring as standard of care.

Ranpura V, et al.
Am J Hypertens · Bevacizumab
PMID 20186127 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Checkpoint inhibitors

Deep dive →

Immune-mediated acute interstitial nephritis and its steroid response.

Case series2016
AIN 12/13

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in 12 of 13 biopsied patients, at a median of 91 days after checkpoint-inhibitor initiation

The founding description of checkpoint-inhibitor nephritis. It established acute interstitial nephritis as the signature lesion and set the diagnostic-and-steroid template that every subsequent multicenter cohort was built upon.

Cortazar FB, et al.
Kidney International · Checkpoint inhibitors
PMID 27282937 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2019
3%

30 of 1016 (3%) had potential checkpoint-inhibitor-related AKI; 169 (17%) developed any AKI and 82 (8%) sustained AKI within 12 months

It anchored the field's incidence estimates by separating the frequent, heterogeneous 'any AKI' signal from the smaller ICI-attributable fraction across a complete single-center population of 1016 recipients, and first flagged PPIs as a modifiable risk factor.

Seethapathy H, et al.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (CJASN) · Checkpoint inhibitors
PMID 31672794 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Outcome2020
22% rechallenged

ICI rechallenge occurred in 22% of patients, of whom 23% developed recurrent associated AKI; tubulointerstitial nephritis was the dominant lesion in 93% of the 60 patients biopsied

It turned single-center description into generalizable, independently associated risk factors and provided the first real rechallenge estimate: most patients rechallenged did NOT recur, reframing ICI-AKI as frequently not an absolute contraindication to resuming immunotherapy.

Cortazar FB, et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) · Checkpoint inhibitors
PMID 31896554 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2021
OR 2.64

Corticosteroids within 14 days of ICPi-AKI diagnosis associated with renal recovery (adjusted OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.58 to 4.41); recovery in 276 of 429 patients (64.3%)

This is the definitive evidence base for treating ICI-AKI with corticosteroids and treating early; its effect size is the figure guidelines cite for steroid management, and it also showed rechallenge did not worsen survival.

Gupta S, et al.
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · Checkpoint inhibitors
PMID 34625513 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Platinum & cytotoxics

Deep dive →

Cisplatin acute tubular necrosis and magnesium wasting.

Incidence1979
52%

Hypomagnesemia in 23 of 44 evaluable patients (~52%) receiving cisplatin

The founding systematic clinical description of cisplatin renal magnesium wasting. It defined a signature electrolyte lesion of platinum therapy and created the enduring standard of routine magnesium monitoring and repletion during cisplatin chemotherapy.

Schilsky RL, Anderson T
Annals of Internal Medicine · Cisplatin
PMID 375794 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2018
13.6%

Cisplatin-AKI in 13.6% (development cohort) and 11.6% (validation cohort) after the first course

The first validated bedside risk score for cisplatin AKI. It notably found that baseline kidney function did not predict risk, shifting risk stratification toward age, dose, hypertension and albumin, and became the reference model later cohorts were benchmarked against.

Motwani SS, McMahon GM, Humphreys BD, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · Cisplatin
PMID 29320311 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2024
5.2%

Severe CP-AKI incidence 5.2% (608/11,766) derivation and 3.3% (421/12,951) validation across 24,717 patients at six centers

The definitive modern incidence and risk-stratification study for cisplatin nephrotoxicity, spanning 24,717 adults across six US cancer centers, and it linked greater CP-AKI severity to markedly worse 90-day survival (adjusted HR 4.63 for stage 3).

Gupta S, Glezerman IG, Hirsch JS, et al.
BMJ · Cisplatin
PMID 38538012 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2025
OR 0.80

CP-AKI or death in 2.7% (104/3893) with IV magnesium vs 5.3% (520/9826) without; adjusted odds ratio 0.80

The largest study to date supporting magnesium prophylaxis for cisplatin nephrotoxicity, connecting Schilsky's 1979 observation of renal magnesium wasting to a concrete, low-cost renoprotective intervention.

Gupta S, Glezerman IG, Hirsch JS, et al.
JAMA Oncology · Cisplatin + IV magnesium
PMID 40272825 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

EGFR & electrolytes

Deep dive →

Anti-EGFR magnesium wasting and cancer electrolyte disorders.

Incidence2005
8 of 154

8 of the 154 cetuximab-treated patients reviewed had grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia (6 grade 3, 2 grade 4) — but only 34 (22%) had a serum magnesium drawn at all, so 8/34 overstates the rate and 8/154 understates it; testing was not systematic and the series yields no true incidence

The index report that put anti-EGFR hypomagnesemia on the clinical map, prompting routine serum-magnesium monitoring and supplementation on cetuximab and framing the renal-reabsorption hypothesis that later work confirmed.

Schrag D, et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst · Cetuximab
PMID 16106027 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Mechanism2007
TRPM6

EGF identified as a magnesiotropic hormone that activates TRPM6 via the EGFR — the molecular basis explaining cetuximab-induced hypomagnesemia

The founding mechanistic paper of the field: it supplies the EGF to EGFR to TRPM6 pathway that explains the entire anti-EGFR-antibody class effect on magnesium, connecting a rare Mendelian disorder to an on-target drug toxicity.

Groenestege WM, et al.
J Clin Invest · Cetuximab / EGF–EGFR
PMID 17671655 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2012
47%

Hyponatremia in 47% of admissions (36% mild, 10% moderate, 1% severe); 90-day mortality HR 2.04 / 4.74 / 3.46

The landmark cohort quantifying how common hyponatremia is on a cancer ward and tying it to 90-day mortality, making sodium a prognostic marker in oncology. Two limits travel with it: the study stratified admissions by sodium band and adjudicated no causes, so it says nothing about which mechanism dominates; and the mortality signal is not a clean gradient — the hazard ratio peaks at moderate hyponatremia (4.74) rather than severe (3.46).

Doshi SM, et al.
Am J Kidney Dis · Cancer inpatients
PMID 22001181 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2015
34%

All-grade hypomagnesemia incidence 34.0% across 16,411 patients in 25 RCTs

The broadest quantitative estimate of the electrolyte-disorder burden of the anti-EGFR-antibody class, anchoring the ~one-third all-grade hypomagnesemia figure across 16,000-plus randomized patients and formalizing the monitoring imperative.

Wang Q, et al.
Tumour Biol · Anti-EGFR antibodies
PMID 25542231 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Methotrexate

Deep dive →

High-dose methotrexate crystal nephropathy and glucarpidase rescue.

Incidence2004
1.8%

1.8% (68 of 3,887 osteosarcoma patients) developed grade ≥2 nephrotoxicity; 4.4% (3 of 68) of those died

The foundational cohort that put a hard number on how often HD-MTX injures the kidney and how lethal it can be; it is the incidence figure the field still cites and it made the case that carboxypeptidase-G2 (glucarpidase), not hemodialysis, is the rescue of choice for delayed MTX excretion.

Widemann BC, et al.
Cancer · High-dose methotrexate
PMID 15139068 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2010
98.7% ↓

Plasma methotrexate fell 98.7% within 15 minutes of glucarpidase

The pivotal clinical/pharmacologic dataset behind glucarpidase's use in HD-MTX renal failure — it proved both the speed/magnitude of MTX clearance and, critically, that outcome hinges on giving the enzyme early rather than late.

Widemann BC, et al.
J Clin Oncol · Glucarpidase (HD-MTX)
PMID 20679598 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2016
2–12%

Acute kidney injury occurs in 2%–12% of patients receiving high-dose methotrexate

The most widely used practical reference for HD-MTX toxicity; its 2%–12% AKI figure and management framework became the default teaching and protocol basis for administering HD-MTX safely across adult and pediatric cancers.

Howard SC, et al.
Oncologist · High-dose methotrexate
PMID 27496039 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Bisphosphonates

Deep dive →

Pamidronate collapsing FSGS and zoledronate acute tubular necrosis.

Case series2001
7 cases

7 patients (the first reported series)

The founding paper of the field. Until this series, collapsing FSGS was a diagnosis of young African-American, HIV-positive, or idiopathic patients; Markowitz established the first drug etiology for it, putting high-dose IV aminobisphosphonate on the nephrotoxicity map and creating the entity 'pamidronate-associated collapsing FSGS' that every later description references.

Markowitz GS, Appel GB, Fine PL, et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) · Pamidronate
PMID 11373339 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2003
1.4 → 3.4

serum creatinine rose from a mean baseline of 1.4 mg/dL to 3.4 mg/dL (n=6)

Founded the second, distinct bisphosphonate kidney injury and — crucially — showed it was NOT collapsing FSGS despite all six patients' prior pamidronate exposure. This established the drug-specific dichotomy (zoledronate → toxic ATN, pamidronate → collapsing FSGS). Its reversibility half is what underpins checking creatinine before each dose: all six improved after withdrawal. It demonstrates no dose or infusion-rate gradient and cannot — every patient received the identical labeled 4 mg over at least 15 minutes, so the injury occurred at correct dosing.

Markowitz GS, Fine PL, Stack JI, et al.
Kidney International · Zoledronate
PMID 12787420 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Mechanism2008
2 patterns

two distinct, drug-specific injury patterns: toxic ATN (zoledronate) vs collapsing FSGS (pamidronate)

The reference review that fused the two founding biopsy descriptions into the single clinical framework clinicians and this atlas use. It made the entity-per-drug dichotomy the standard teaching and articulated why oral and osteoporosis-dose bisphosphonates are largely spared (lower dose, longer intervals).

Perazella MA, Markowitz GS
Kidney International · IV bisphosphonates
PMID 18685574 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Drug-induced TMA

Deep dive →

Which anti-cancer drugs cause thrombotic microangiopathy, and by what evidence.

Incidence1989
4–15%

risk of cancer-associated HUS after mitomycin between 4% and 15% (85 registry cases, mitomycin in 84, >50% mortality)

The landmark registry that defined mitomycin-associated HUS/TMA as a distinct, dose-dependent, frequently fatal syndrome — the founding cohort for chemotherapy-induced thrombotic microangiopathy and the reason cumulative-dose monitoring entered mitomycin practice.

Lesesne JB, Rothschild N, Erickson B, Korec S, Sisk R, Keller J, Arbus M, Woolley PV, Chiazze L, Schein PS, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · Mitomycin C
PMID 2497229 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence1999
0.015%

crude overall incidence 0.015% (range, 0.008-0.078%) among 78,800 gemcitabine-exposed patients

The founding quantification of gemcitabine HUS/TMA risk; the ~0.015% figure remains the anchor incidence clinicians cite when weighing gemcitabine's renal danger, and it converted case-report suspicion into a defensible denominator.

Fung MC, Storniolo AM, Nguyen B, Arning M, Brookfield W, Vigil J
Cancer · Gemcitabine
PMID 10223245 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Case series2015
22 drugs

22 of 78 drugs had definite causal evidence for TMA (20 more probable)

The reference drug-induced-TMA systematic review: its definite/probable/possible evidence-grading framework became the field standard for adjudicating whether a given anti-cancer agent truly causes TMA, replacing scattered anecdote with a reproducible causal threshold that every later cohort is measured against.

Al-Nouri ZL, Reese JA, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, George JN
Blood · Multiple agents (DITMA)
PMID 25414441 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Tumor lysis syndrome

Deep dive →

The defining classification, risk model, and rasburicase trials.

Effect size2001
86% vs 12%

86% vs 12% reduction in plasma uric acid 4 hours after the first dose (rasburicase vs allopurinol); uric-acid AUC(0–96) 128±70 vs 329±129 mg/dL·h, P < .0001

The landmark pediatric RCT that established recombinant urate oxidase as superior to allopurinol and drove FDA approval of rasburicase — the practice-changing trial that redefined hyperuricemia prophylaxis in high-risk malignancy.

Goldman SC, Holcenberg JS, Finklestein JZ, et al.
Blood · Rasburicase vs allopurinol
PMID 11342423 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Mechanism2004
5 derangements

Unifies the 5 metabolic derangements of TLS (hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, uremia) into a single laboratory + graded clinical (grade 0–V) classification

Before this paper there was no standardized definition; the Cairo–Bishop classification became the reference definition used in essentially every subsequent TLS guideline, trial, and cohort, making outcomes comparable across studies.

Cairo MS, Bishop M
British Journal of Haematology · Urate-lowering therapy
PMID 15384972 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Mechanism2008
3 tiers

Three-tier risk model (high / intermediate / low) driving prophylaxis — high-risk = hydration + prophylactic rasburicase; low-risk = monitoring

The Coiffier et al. consensus became the internationally cited practice standard for TLS prevention, codifying rasburicase for high-risk patients and settling the alkalinization debate — the guideline clinicians reference at the bedside.

Coiffier B, Altman A, Pui CH, Younes A, Cairo MS
Journal of Clinical Oncology · Rasburicase / allopurinol
PMID 18509186 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2010
87% vs 66%

Plasma uric-acid response 87% with rasburicase vs 66% with allopurinol (P = .001); 90% vs 53% in baseline-hyperuricemic patients

The pivotal adult phase III RCT that extended the pediatric rasburicase evidence to adults and underpinned adult guideline recommendations and regulatory use of rasburicase in high-risk TLS.

Cortes J, Moore JO, Maziarz RT, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · Rasburicase vs allopurinol
PMID 20713865 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

CAR-T & cellular therapy

Deep dive →

Acute kidney injury after CAR-T and its link to cytokine release.

Incidence2020
30%

30% cumulative incidence of any-grade AKI by day 100 (95% CI 16.9–43.9%); grade 2–3 in only 8.7%, no renal replacement therapy

The founding cohort that put AKI after CAR-T on the map. Its 'low incidence and rapid recovery' framing plus the explicit CRS link became the reference point for essentially every subsequent onco-nephrology discussion of cellular therapy.

Gutgarts V et al.
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · CD19 CAR-T
PMID 32088364 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2024
22%

154 of 694 patients (22%) developed AKI across 15 studies; of those 154, stage 1 in 89 (57.8%), stage 2/3 in 59 (38.3%), and renal replacement therapy in 16 (10.4%) — most recovered with symptomatic treatment

The reference synthesis clinicians cite for how often AKI complicates CAR-T and how severe it tends to be, pulling the scattered single-center cohorts into one field-level figure. Read it as a crude sum, not a pooled estimate: the counts are simple totals across the 15 studies with no random-effects model and no confidence interval, and PubMed indexes the record as a Review rather than a Meta-Analysis.

Yang Y et al.
Clinical Immunology · CAR-T (CD19)
PMID 38996858 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Effect size2024
OR 16.4

Severe CRS associated with AKI: OR 16.4 (95% CI 1.9–138.5), p=0.01; severe AKI predicted worse survival (HR 18.2, 95% CI 2.6–27.3)

Pins the CRS→AKI link to a striking effect size and closes the loop to survival, cementing severe CRS as the dominant driver of kidney injury after CAR-T rather than an incidental association.

Russo E et al.
Scientific Reports · CAR-T
PMID 39506012 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Myeloma & paraprotein

Treating the myeloma kidney and the concept of MGRS.

Outcome2010
62%

Renal response in 62% of patients (renal CR 31%, renal PR 7%, renal MR 24%); median GFR rose from 20.5 to 48.4 mL/min

One of the first prospective demonstrations that a bortezomib-based regimen can rapidly reverse severe light-chain AKI, cementing bortezomib as the chemotherapy backbone for myeloma kidney and showing renal impairment is often reversible with the right anti-clone therapy.

Ludwig H, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · Bortezomib (BDD)
PMID 20823423 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Mechanism2012
MGRS

Introduced the term 'monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance' (MGRS) — a new disease category carved out of MGUS

The field-founding paper that separated MGRS from 'benign' MGUS, establishing that the nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin itself — not tumor burden — is the treatment indication. It reframed how nephrologists and hematologists approach paraprotein kidney disease.

Leung N, et al. (International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group)
Blood · Clone-directed therapy
PMID 23047823 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Outcome2017
41% vs 33%

Dialysis independence at 3 months: 41.3% (n=19) with high-cutoff hemodialysis vs 33.3% (n=16) with conventional hemodialysis — not statistically significant

The definitive randomized trial testing whether aggressive extracorporeal free-light-chain removal adds anything to bortezomib-based chemotherapy. Its negative primary endpoint moved cast-nephropathy management away from the dialysis membrane and back to rapid, effective anti-myeloma therapy as the true lever on renal recovery.

Bridoux F, et al. (MYRE Study Group)
JAMA · Bortezomib; high-cutoff HD
PMID 29209721 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

AKI in critical illness

Acute kidney injury and dialysis in the oncologic ICU.

Incidence2006
32%

309 of 975 (32%) developed acute renal dysfunction; 98 (32% of those) received dialysis

One of the first large prospective cohorts to quantify AKI frequency, dialysis requirement, and outcomes across BOTH solid and hematologic cancers in the ICU — and to document high renal recovery among survivors, key early evidence that intensive organ support is justified in cancer patients.

Soares M, Salluh JI, Carvalho MS, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · Oncologic ICU
PMID 16921054 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Outcome2013
39% vs 68%

6-month complete remission 39.4% vs 68.3% with vs without AKI (P<0.01)

The landmark study linking AKI directly to CANCER outcomes rather than survival alone — by showing AKI compromised delivery of optimal chemotherapy and lowered remission, it reframed renal protection in the oncologic ICU as protection of oncologic efficacy.

Canet E, Zafrani L, Lambert J, et al.
PLoS One · Induction chemotherapy
PMID 23457485 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2015
66.5%

671 of 1,009 (66.5%) developed AKI; adjusted OR for hospital death 1.65 (95% CI 1.19–2.29)

The definitive GRRR-OH primary dataset behind the field's canonical 'two-thirds develop AKI' figure. It showed hospital mortality in these patients now approaches that of the general ICU population, directly undercutting the historic therapeutic nihilism about dialyzing cancer patients.

Darmon M, Vincent F, Canet E, et al.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · Haematologic malignancy
PMID 26597921 (opens PubMed in a new tab)

Epidemiology & burden

How common kidney disease is in cancer, and what it costs in survival.

Incidence2007
57%

57.4% (Cockcroft-Gault) / 52.9% (aMDRD) had abnormal renal function, yet only 7.2% had an elevated serum creatinine (n=4,684)

The IRMA study was the first large (~5,000-patient) national prevalence survey of kidney function in cancer, and it reframed the field: most cancer patients with impaired GFR have a 'normal' creatinine, so GFR must be estimated, not assumed. It also exposed the downstream dosing crisis — over half of anticancer prescriptions required dose adaptation for renal function — making it the founding reference for renal dose-adjustment in oncology.

Launay-Vacher V et al. (IRMA Study Group)
Cancer · Systemic anticancer therapy
PMID 17634949 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2011
17.5%

1-year AKI risk 17.5% (95% CI 17.1-17.9%); 5-year risk 27.0%; incidence 258 (95% CI 252-264) per 1,000 person-years in the first year

The population-based cohort that put a hard number on how often cancer patients develop AKI, using unselected registry linkage rather than a single center. It anchored the modern understanding that AKI is a common, cancer-type-dependent complication and became a reference incidence figure for the field. Regional rather than nationwide: Northern Denmark, about 1.2 million of the country's population, with AKI ascertained from a laboratory database covering that area.

Christiansen CF et al.
European Journal of Internal Medicine · All-cancer cohort
PMID 21767759 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2013
12%

12% of the 3,558 PATIENTS admitted over the 3-month window had AKI (RIFLE Risk 68%, Injury 21%, Failure 11%); dialysis in 4%; AKI carried 4.7-fold greater odds of death, with length of stay and cost each roughly doubled

A landmark single-center inpatient study that linked AKI incidence directly to a hard mortality signal in cancer patients, moving the field beyond 'AKI happens' to 'AKI kills.' Its RIFLE-based severity gradient and modifiable risk factors (IV contrast OR 4.55, chemotherapy OR 1.61) made it a cornerstone reference for onco-nephrology risk assessment.

Salahudeen AK et al.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (CJASN) · Cancer inpatients
PMID 23243268 (opens PubMed in a new tab)
Incidence2019
9.3%

AKI rate 27 per 1,000 person-years; overall cumulative incidence 9.3% (5-year incidence 26.0% in myeloma)

The definitive population-based cohort tying AKI to active systemic cancer treatment. It demonstrated both a treatment-proximate risk window and a rising secular trend, framing therapy-associated AKI as a growing, measurable public-health burden as more patients receive systemic therapy.

Kitchlu A et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) · Systemic anticancer therapy
PMID 30423160 (opens PubMed in a new tab)